Our analysts compared Acumatica vs ZarMoney based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Accounting Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Accounting Software
Acumatica has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 89% when considering 2062 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
ZarMoney has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 143 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Acumatica and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Multi-company Accounting and Asset Management.
ZarMoney stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
User reviews, coupled with our extensive research, confirm Acumatica’s reputation for flexibility and scalability. Still, certain features and overall performance have drawn mixed reviews.First, the positives. A majority of user reviews highlight Acumatica’s functionality and its ease of use. Popular mentions include the quoting and billing, accounts location, and inventory management features. Other honorable mentions are the accounts payable and invoice routing tools.Reviewers specifically mention that managing administrative functions is a breeze and accessible from anywhere. One user even mentioned that their business is retiring other legacy systems because Acumatica fulfills those needs by offering tools to manage various business functions on one platform with complete access to past data.For those who swear by Excel, Acumatica offers a comforting bridge with its robust Excel integration. The export to Excel feature is available on every grid. No more tedious manual transfers.However, drawbacks like the less-than-ideal calendar feature and tricky project management tools have been noted. Users say that project management, while capable of managing multiple projects at once, could have fewer steps.The platform’s performance can be a hiccup. Multiple users experienced glitches, especially when dealing with large datasets or navigating through generic inquiries. The system also logs out after 60 minutes of idle time. Defining user inactivity timeout is only available for Acumatica 2023 R1 and beyond.Beyond user reviews, our research team delved into the strengths and weaknesses of Acumatica. According to our research, it’s the best in the game for order and service management.Acumatica's biggest differentiator lies in its open architecture and customization options. Unlike some competitors with limited customization or reliance on pre-built modules, Acumatica lets you tailor the platform to their specific workflows and processes.The caveat is that molding the platform will take time and a great deal of expertise (either through internal IT or external support). Implementation will get drawn out, and expediting this process without proper alignment with your business needs will deter you from getting complete value for the amount you pay.The timeline and pricing might not be suitable for smaller firms or startups. Some users also wished the private cloud perpetual (PCP) licensing model wasn't discontinued. We suggest looking for other options if you don’t want to pay a monthly recurring fee.So, is Acumatica right for you?Acumatica is a strong contender if your business demands a highly adaptable system and you're prepared to invest time and resources in customization. However, if you prioritize rapid implementation and lightning-fast performance, you might want to explore other options.
ZarMoney users praise its user-friendly interface and comprehensive feature set, making it ideal for small businesses and individuals with basic to moderate accounting needs. They particularly appreciate the customizable dashboard, mobile app, and responsive customer support, simplifying financial management on the go and ensuring prompt assistance when needed. Compared to competitors like QuickBooks, users find ZarMoney more intuitive and budget-friendly, especially for its core functionalities. However, some limitations emerge for complex accounting or high-volume businesses. ZarMoney's scalability can feel restrictive, prompting users to graduate to more powerful software. Integration with specific third-party tools can also be challenging, requiring extra effort to set up. While offering report customization, the level of detail might not suffice for users seeking advanced financial analysis. Overall, ZarMoney shines for its ease of use, affordability, and essential features. Users looking for a simple yet powerful accounting solution for their growing business will find ZarMoney a strong contender. But for intricate financial structures or extensive customization needs, exploring alternatives might be necessary.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...