CATS ATS vs HireBeat
Last Updated:Our analysts compared CATS ATS vs HireBeat based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Applicant Tracking Systems, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Product Basics
Product Assistance
Product Insights
Product Ranking
User Sentiment Summary
Awards
HireBeat stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Synopsis of User Ratings and Reviews
Is CATS ATS the purr-fect solution for your hiring needs? User reviews from the last year suggest a mixed bag. While CATS ATS, a web-based applicant tracking system, is praised for its user-friendly interface and economical pricing at $110 per user per month, making it a budget-friendly option for small to mid-sized businesses, some limitations might make you hesitant. Users rave about the software's intuitive design and robust features like automated resume parsing, which efficiently extracts and organizes candidate information, saving recruiters valuable time. The platform's high configurability is another plus, allowing businesses to tailor recruitment workflows and integrate with popular apps like Slack and Google Drive. However, the lack of a mobile application is a notable drawback in today's mobile-first world. Users also point out the limited reporting tools, which can hinder data-driven decision-making. Additionally, the absence of features like background checking and onboarding means businesses might need to rely on separate solutions, potentially increasing costs and complexity. In essence, CATS ATS is like a well-trained housecat – it handles basic tasks efficiently but might not be ready to tackle more complex challenges. It's a solid choice for businesses seeking an affordable and easy-to-use ATS to streamline their hiring process. However, those with high-volume recruiting or needing advanced features like background checks might find CATS ATS more limiting than liberating.
Is your hiring process stuck in a rut? User reviews from the past year suggest HireBeat might be the rhythm your recruitment needs. Users rave about HireBeat's user-friendly interface and streamlined approach, allowing them to ditch the administrative headaches and focus on finding the perfect candidate. One user, a partner at a management consulting firm, highlighted how HireBeat simplified their candidate management flow, allowing for seamless team collaboration and eliminating the need for constant resume sharing. This sentiment is echoed by another user who praised HireBeat's efficiency, stating it "saved a lot of time avoiding scheduling and making many calls just to screen job candidates." They particularly appreciated the ability to test the platform with a single job posting, a feature absent in other applicant tracking systems. However, like a catchy song with a few off-key notes, HireBeat has some areas for improvement. Users have pointed out the lack of features like assessments and screen sharing, which can be dealbreakers for some. Additionally, while generally considered visually appealing, some users suggested minor UI design tweaks. Despite these minor drawbacks, HireBeat's intuitive design, time-saving automation, and affordable pricing make it a hit among startups and small to mid-sized businesses. It's a tool that empowers these companies to compete for top-tier talent without breaking the bank or getting bogged down in administrative tasks.
Screenshots
Top Alternatives in Applicant Tracking Systems
ApplicantStack
Breezy HR
Bullhorn
CEIPAL ATS
Greenhouse
iCIMS
JazzHR
JobDiva
Jobvite
Lever
Manatal
SmartRecruiters
SuccessFactors Recruiting
SuccessFactors Talent Management
Taleo
Trakstar Hire
Workable
Zoho Recruit
Related Categories
FAQ
We’re the employee-owned Austin-based startup democratizing software data so you can make your decisions in an influence-free zone. Our market data is crowdsourced from our user-base of 100,000+ companies.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...