Kwantek vs CATS ATS
Last Updated:Our analysts compared Kwantek vs CATS ATS based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Applicant Tracking Systems, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Product Basics
Product Assistance
Product Insights
Product Ranking
User Sentiment Summary
Synopsis of User Ratings and Reviews
Is Kwantek really the right tool for your businesses? User reviews from the past year present a mixed bag. While some users rave about Kwantek's user-friendliness and efficiency, others point out glaring weaknesses. For instance, a February 2022 review on Capterra praises Kwantek's intuitive design and robust analytics, highlighting its ability to streamline the hiring process and provide valuable insights for improvement. However, the same review criticizes the clunky onboarding module, EHX, citing difficulties in navigation and training. This contradiction suggests that Kwantek's strengths lie in attracting and screening candidates, but it might fall short in providing a seamless onboarding experience. Another user on Capterra points out the inability to edit candidate information, which could be a major drawback for a system designed to manage applicant data. Despite these shortcomings, Kwantek differentiates itself through its industry-specific focus on the cleaning and security sectors. Its features, such as pre-built templates tailored for these industries and access to specialized job boards, make it particularly appealing to businesses in those niches. Overall, Kwantek seems like a good fit for small to medium-sized businesses in the cleaning and security industries that prioritize attracting and screening candidates over a smooth onboarding process. However, businesses across other industries or those with a greater emphasis on onboarding might find Kwantek's limitations a deal-breaker and should explore alternative solutions.
Is CATS ATS the purr-fect solution for your hiring needs? User reviews from the last year suggest a mixed bag. While CATS ATS, a web-based applicant tracking system, is praised for its user-friendly interface and economical pricing at $110 per user per month, making it a budget-friendly option for small to mid-sized businesses, some limitations might make you hesitant. Users rave about the software's intuitive design and robust features like automated resume parsing, which efficiently extracts and organizes candidate information, saving recruiters valuable time. The platform's high configurability is another plus, allowing businesses to tailor recruitment workflows and integrate with popular apps like Slack and Google Drive. However, the lack of a mobile application is a notable drawback in today's mobile-first world. Users also point out the limited reporting tools, which can hinder data-driven decision-making. Additionally, the absence of features like background checking and onboarding means businesses might need to rely on separate solutions, potentially increasing costs and complexity. In essence, CATS ATS is like a well-trained housecat – it handles basic tasks efficiently but might not be ready to tackle more complex challenges. It's a solid choice for businesses seeking an affordable and easy-to-use ATS to streamline their hiring process. However, those with high-volume recruiting or needing advanced features like background checks might find CATS ATS more limiting than liberating.
Screenshots
Top Alternatives in Applicant Tracking Systems
ApplicantStack
Breezy HR
Bullhorn
CEIPAL ATS
Greenhouse
iCIMS
JazzHR
JobDiva
Jobvite
Lever
Manatal
SmartRecruiters
SuccessFactors Recruiting
SuccessFactors Talent Management
Taleo
Trakstar Hire
Workable
Zoho Recruit
Related Categories
FAQ
We’re the employee-owned Austin-based startup democratizing software data so you can make your decisions in an influence-free zone. Our market data is crowdsourced from our user-base of 100,000+ companies.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...