Looker Studio vs SAP HANA

User reviews for Google Looker Studio indicate both strengths and weaknesses. Many users praise its intuitive interface, which simplifies data analysis. The platform's powerful visualization tools and real-time insights are widely appreciated, enabling users to present and act on data effectively. Collaboration features also receive positive feedback, facilitating teamwork and informed decision-making. However, several users highlight challenges. A notable drawback is the steep learning curve, especially for those without SQL or data analysis skills. Some users find data integration complex and resource-intensive, potentially impacting performance. Cost considerations also arise, with users noting that Looker Studio's pricing may not align with all budgets. In comparison to similar products, Looker Studio stands out for its user-friendly interface and strong visualization capabilities. However, some users mention limitations in offline functionality, which competitors may handle better. Overall, Google Looker Studio appears to be a valuable tool for data analysis and collaboration, but it may require a learning curve and careful consideration of budget constraints.

SAP HANA is a multi-model database and analytics platform that combines real-time transactional data with predictive analytics and machine learning capabilities to drive business decisions quicker. Most of the users who mentioned analytics said that, with its Online Analytical Processing(OLAP) and Online Transactional Processing(OLTP) capabilities, the tool analyzes data faster with predictive modeling and machine learning. Many users who reviewed data processing said that the tool has a lean data model due to its in-memory architecture and columnar storage capabilities, and, paired with its compression algorithm, can perform calculations on-the-fly on huge volumes of data. In reference to data integration, many users said that the platform connects seamlessly with both SAP and non-SAP systems, such as mapping tools like ArcGIS, to migrate data to a consolidated repository, though quite a few users said that integration with media files and Google APIs is tedious. Most of the users who reviewed support said that they are responsive, and online user communities and documentation help in resolving issues, whereas some users said that the support reps had limited knowledge. A majority of the users who reviewed its speed said that the platform has a fast runtime, though some users said that it requires high-performing hardware infrastructure to do so and that memory management might be tricky with large datasets. The software does have its limitations though. Being in-memory, the tool is RAM-intensive, which can add to the cost of ownership, though some users said that data compression reduces the database size and saves on hardware cost. A majority of the users who reviewed its functionality said that it needs to be more mature in terms of flexibility and agility, though some users said that with easy updates and maintenance, it is a robust solution and increases efficiency and productivity. In summary, SAP HANA serves as a single source of truth for analysis of large volumes of data and uncovering consumer insights through planning, forecasting and drill-down reporting. However, it seems more suited for large organizations with complex data types and analytics workflows because of its costly pricing plans.