Looker vs Pyramid Analytics

Looker is a forerunner in the business intelligence field for a reason; it generates reports that include easy sharing via link, automatic scheduling and a level of granular detail that allows for deeper analysis below the surface. It excels in its filter and drill-down features and creates unique URLs when users make changes to data, leading to enhanced sharing. However, one of its biggest strengths could also be considered one of its biggest weaknesses: its proprietary programming language, LookML which is used to construct SQL queries in the platform. While a flexible and powerful data querying language, of course, LookML isn’t the most accessible to non-technical users, which means that Looker requires an IT or data team to access its full capabilities and has a steep learning curve. Users also note that its data visualizations, while simple and easy to understand, are quite basic and lacking in customization options, particularly in comparison to competitors. Some users say that it may be more appropriate for internal reporting than presentation to shareholders and end-users because of its bare-bones visualization options. However, Looker truly shines when used by enterprises, with its scalability and data accessibility making it a stellar solution that can align departments and provide thousands of users access to data insights. Its price point reflects this, with its pricing being prohibitive to startups as about 88% of users who comment on its cost remark. Overall, Looker is a solid pick for larger businesses that have a team of power users who can maximize its functionality and set it up to deliver to employees across an entire organization.

Pyramid Analytics is a flexible, scalable BI platform with machine learning capabilities. It lets users mash up data from multiple sources, model data within the application and run reports in mere minutes, as opposed to manual processes that would take hours.Its numerous features have the ability to carry out complex data analysis. Users found customer support to be helpful when demonstrating the tool’s full potential. Users also liked the ability to incorporate AI into their dashboards. However, Some users found navigating through dashboards to be difficult. Users also complained that dashboard features could be more effective. New features were sometimes unstable, introducing bugs to existing functionality. Conclusively, it is a cost-effective, intuitive solution with excellent support that can quickly deliver insights to all levels of a businesses.