Our analysts compared NVivo vs KNIME based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Business Intelligence Tools, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
NVivo is a qualitative data analysis solution for academic and industrial research. It lets users code and visualize their findings from interviews, surveys, text documents and demographic information. It’s helpful in social sciences, education and healthcare.
It has a friendly interface, powerful searches and advanced graphics. Once set up, the system can perform automatic sentiment analysis. Users can record the coding schemes and use them across the data. Documenting the steps enables future researchers to validate the research.
The vendor offers exclusive modules for collaboration and transcription. Its Collaboration Cloud lets many people work on the same project.
among all Business Intelligence Tools
NVivo has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 82% when considering 179 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
KNIME has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 89% when considering 236 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
NVivo is qualitative data analysis software that received positive reviews from users. They appreciate its user-friendly interface, powerful features and ability to handle large datasets.However, some users complained about lax customer support and the occasional bug.NVivo is popular but not as robust as some of the other options. It’s also expensive. However, many users believe that the extra cost is worth it for the additional features and functionality. It has robust coding features to analyze large amounts of data quickly.Overall, NVivo is a user-friendly qualitative data analysis software that can be expensive and complex for individual users but is a handy assistant for teams.
KNIME is a robust open-source solution with cross-platform interoperability. It integrates with a range of software, such as JS, R, Python and Spark. With a variety of nodes and functions, it can process large datasets with a decent level of control in each step. Workflows are displayed as connected nodes, making it easy to isolate and fix specific steps. It also contains built-in tools to create and test supervised and unsupervised machine learning models. Users found the UI very intuitive and flexible. On the flip side, they found the tool visually lacking and primitive. The system also has performance and stability issues. Processing big data is very time consuming since the platform isn’t cloud-based. Users reported excessive memory usage as well. It also lacks reporting or monitoring features. Decent technical knowledge is required to fully leverage its capabilities.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...