RingCentral vs Lingo Communications

RingCentral provides cloud communications and contact center services to enterprises. Around 92% of the users who review accessibility praise the software for seamless call switching between devices, including personal mobile phones, though some say access can be tricky in areas with low internet speeds. Of the users who discuss its features, 70% appreciate the convenience of calls, messaging and video conferencing being available in one app. The platform definitely has an edge over other service providers in that there is no time limit restriction on meetings. The interface is easy to navigate, say 69% of the users who discuss its user-friendliness, though a few users say it’s dated and could do with a more modern look. Approximately 60% of the users who mention support say they’re helpful, though some users find them unresponsive and difficult to reach. On the flip side, around 83% of the users who review the solution’s performance say it’s clunky and audio and video quality suffers on low internet bandwidth. To sum up, RingCentral is a cross-device communications provider that streamlines call management, video conferences and business meetings on one platform for small, mid-size and large organizations.

Is Lingo Communications all it's cracked up to be, or will it leave you tongue-tied? User reviews from the past year paint a bleak picture of Lingo Communications, with a litany of recurring complaints. Customers frequently report abysmal customer service experiences, citing unresponsive support and a struggle to get issues resolved. Predatory billing practices are another common grievance, with users mentioning unexpected charges and arduous cancellation processes, often incurring hefty fees. Service reliability emerges as a major concern, with numerous reports of outages and technical issues, leaving some customers without service for extended periods. While Lingo Communications claims to offer a modern and efficient IP-based cloud voice and data service, the overwhelming negative feedback regarding customer service and billing practices overshadows any potential benefits. For instance, one user reported being billed for a service that was never hooked up, highlighting the company's questionable billing practices. Another user shared their experience of enduring dropped calls after an hour, a hidden policy that only came to light after repeated occurrences. These issues, coupled with the negative sentiment expressed across multiple platforms, suggest that Lingo Communications falls short compared to its competitors. In conclusion, Lingo Communications seems best suited for those who enjoy playing Russian roulette with their business communications. The overwhelming negative feedback, particularly concerning customer service, billing, and service reliability, makes it challenging to recommend Lingo Communications to any business seeking a reliable and trustworthy communications provider. Potential customers are advised to explore alternative options that prioritize customer satisfaction and transparent business practices.