Our analysts compared Aconex vs PASKR based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Construction Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Construction Management Software
Aconex has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 437 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
PASKR has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 85% when considering 186 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Oracle Aconex is suitable for large engineering and construction projects, though not so much for smaller operations. Its document management feature impressed most of its users, though many think that its interface isn’t easy to navigate. It does not support cut and paste from external documents to a message. Since it is a web-based module, the efficiency of this application depends on internet connectivity. Users liked that documents could be exported to Excel sheets. Some users complained that it wasn’t very reliable as a system and that they had to continuously refresh the page to make it work.
Paskr provides a one-stop-shop for all project management needs, focusing on ease of use and saving time. Approving subcontractor invoices is simple and ensures that all documents are in place. Most users said that PASKR has made it possible to streamline many of their day-to-day activities, such as project acquisition monitoring, subcontractor management, billing, time management and more. Customer support is easily accessible, quick, responsive, knowledgeable and willing to take feedback to make the user experience better. Users would like to see more reporting features and customization. Integration with other software is limited, and as a few reviewers have mentioned, it does not communicate well with Sage accounting. There are instances where the system would take some time to load.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...