Our analysts compared BIM 360 vs Assemble based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Construction Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all Construction Management Software
BIM 360 has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 81% when considering 1893 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Assemble has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 86% when considering 95 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
User reviews from the past year indicate that BIM 360 is a robust construction management software that streamlines collaboration and improves project efficiency. Its strengths lie in its comprehensive features, including design collaboration, document management, and project scheduling. Users appreciate its ability to connect teams in real-time, reducing communication barriers and fostering a collaborative environment. Additionally, its integration with other Autodesk products and its mobile accessibility are highly valued. Compared to similar products, BIM 360 stands out due to its user-friendly interface, customizable workflows, and extensive support documentation. Users note that its intuitive design makes it easy to navigate, even for those new to construction management software. The ability to tailor the platform to specific project needs is also a key differentiator, allowing teams to optimize their processes. Moreover, the comprehensive support materials and responsive customer service ensure that users can quickly resolve any issues or questions that arise. BIM 360 is particularly suited for large-scale construction projects that involve multiple stakeholders and complex workflows. Its robust collaboration features and ability to manage extensive project data make it an ideal solution for teams seeking to improve communication, streamline processes, and enhance overall project outcomes.
Assemble Insight offers tools to assess a model’s finish and accelerates its takeoff. It helps compare models with drawings and offers the ability to leverage quantities by group, code and quantity. It generates various metrics to track work progress, swiftly extracts relevant information and offers collaborative model visualizations with team members. However, the system doesn’t calculate variations in models accurately, is slow to handle large projects, has a cluttered homepage and cannot be used as a standalone estimation solution.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...