Our analysts compared iSqFt vs ComputerEase based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Construction Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all Construction Management Software
iSqFt has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 84% when considering 141 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
ComputerEase has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 80% when considering 112 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
iSqFt has garnered overwhelmingly positive feedback from users in the construction industry, who praise its comprehensive features and user-friendly interface. Reviewers frequently highlight the software's ability to streamline project management processes, saving both time and money. The platform's scheduling, budgeting, and communication tools have been particularly well-received, with many users noting improved team collaboration and project efficiency as a direct result of using iSqFt. Compared to competitors like Buildertrend and Procore, iSqFt is often lauded for its affordability and ease of use. While some users mention that iSqFt may lack certain advanced features found in higher-priced alternatives, the consensus is that it provides excellent value for its cost, especially for small to medium-sized construction businesses. The software's intuitive design and straightforward functionality make it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise, further contributing to its popularity. iSqFt appears to be an ideal solution for contractors seeking a reliable and efficient construction management software without the complexity and expense of some of the more robust platforms on the market. Its core features address the essential needs of construction professionals, making it a valuable tool for managing projects of all sizes.
ComputerEase is a useful system to track costs for users’ projects and their accounting. Users like how it records expenses easily and lets them set up multiple databases in a group. Some users think that its interface is outdated and could use an update. The reporting feature isn’t very user-friendly as users had to force feed data to create a report and could not send reports from the program itself. With the limited information we had, reviewers didn’t talk about many cons.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...