Looking for alternatives to PASKR? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Dashboard and Reporting, Mobile Capabilities, and Bonus Management. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real Construction Management Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of PASKR to leading industry alternatives like Procore, Corecon, eSUB, and Acculynx.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Construction Management Software
PASKR has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 85% when considering 186 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Procore has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 89% when considering 6694 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Corecon has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 78% when considering 77 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
eSUB has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 91% when considering 314 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Acculynx has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 90% when considering 367 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Paskr provides a one-stop-shop for all project management needs, focusing on ease of use and saving time. Approving subcontractor invoices is simple and ensures that all documents are in place. Most users said that PASKR has made it possible to streamline many of their day-to-day activities, such as project acquisition monitoring, subcontractor management, billing, time management and more. Customer support is easily accessible, quick, responsive, knowledgeable and willing to take feedback to make the user experience better. Users would like to see more reporting features and customization. Integration with other software is limited, and as a few reviewers have mentioned, it does not communicate well with Sage accounting. There are instances where the system would take some time to load.
Procore's user reviews paint a picture of a powerful construction management software with strengths in centralizing data, improving communication, and streamlining workflows. Users praise its mobile accessibility, robust reporting tools, and collaborative features, citing improved project visibility and reduced paperwork as key benefits. However, some reviewers mention a steeper learning curve compared to simpler options and a higher cost point. One recurring strength is Procore's ability to consolidate information and communication. Users appreciate having a central platform for documents, drawings, discussions, and updates, eliminating the need for multiple tools and email threads. This fosters transparency and reduces miscommunication, as exemplified by a reviewer who mentioned avoiding costly delays due to improved information flow. Another frequently lauded aspect is Procore's mobile app, enabling field teams to capture data, submit reports, and access project information in real-time. This streamlines workflows and eliminates data silos, as highlighted by a reviewer who credited the app with improving efficiency and reducing rework. Procore's reporting and analytics tools are also seen as valuable assets. Users appreciate the ability to generate customizable reports and dashboards, providing valuable insights into project performance, resource allocation, and potential risks. This data-driven approach helps users make informed decisions and improve overall project outcomes. However, some users mention a steeper learning curve compared to more basic software, requiring initial investment in training and user adoption. Additionally, Procore's pricing structure can be a barrier for smaller companies or those with limited budgets, while competitors might offer more affordable options with similar core functionalities. In conclusion, Procore's strengths lie in its ability to centralize data, improve communication, and streamline workflows, making it a valuable tool for complex projects and larger teams. However, its learning curve and cost might pose challenges for smaller companies or those seeking basic functionalities. Ultimately, the decision depends on individual needs, project complexity, and budget considerations.
Corecon is easy to use and has a powerful set of features to handle construction management projects. Exporting and importing data from other tools like Sage/Timberline is easy. Users are pleased with its reporting feature as they allow them to edit reports. It gives users access to databases to create reports. QuickBooks integration isn’t seamless for some users and may get buggy. Users say that it may be fit for a small number of large projects. All the information about client billing and subcontractor work is available in one place. The support team is reasonably helpful.
eSUB streamlines project management, provides prompt feedback on projects and simplifies processing change orders and RFI correspondence swiftly. It boosts productivity by delivering accurate information, uploading pictures and communicating with the field staff in real time. Its centralized tracking system monitors job progress from start to finish, stores all work-related information in one place and keeps everyone informed. It is easy to implement, backed by helpful customer support and can be customized to fit a user’s workflows. However, the product has a steep learning curve to get used to its features, doesn’t offer a task reminder function and lacks flexible reporting features. It has limited default areas, logs out several times when idle and its mobile apps offer limited capabilities.
Acculynx offers robust capabilities to track day-to-day work progress, keeps projects on schedule and stores everything in one place for easy access. Its powerful database and all-in-one functionality help users stay on top of their projects and work progress. It organizes business operations, makes information accessible, keeps everyone on the same page and improves overall efficiency. It is backed by helpful customer support that is quick to respond to queries and fix issues. However, the product has a steep learning curve to get used to its features, has a bug-prone mobile interface and is expensive for small businesses. It doesn’t allow importing all Quickbooks data, doesn’t integrate with many third-party modules like CompanyCam and makes it difficult to set up a contact with multiple jobs.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...