Tacton vs Infor CPQ

Tacton has garnered positive feedback for its ability to handle complex product configurations and pricing rules, particularly in industries like manufacturing and engineering. Users appreciate the platform's flexibility and customization options, allowing them to tailor it to their specific needs. The ability to create and manage complex pricing models, including discounts, promotions, and bundles, is a significant advantage. Tacton's integration capabilities with other enterprise systems, such as CRM and ERP, streamline data flow and improve efficiency. Some users have noted that the initial setup and configuration process can be intricate, requiring careful planning and potentially additional support. Compared to similar products, Tacton stands out for its robust configuration engine and ability to handle intricate product structures. Its strength lies in managing complex pricing rules and calculations, making it suitable for businesses with diverse product offerings and pricing strategies. While some users find the interface less intuitive than competitors, they acknowledge the platform's power and flexibility once mastered. Tacton's focus on configuration and pricing makes it ideal for companies with complex products and pricing models, particularly in industries like manufacturing, engineering, and high-tech. Its ability to streamline sales processes, improve quote accuracy, and reduce errors makes it a valuable tool for businesses seeking to enhance sales efficiency and customer satisfaction.

Infor CPQ, a configure-price-quote (CPQ) software, garners mixed reviews from recent users. While some praise its powerful quoting capabilities and robust product configuration engine, others criticize its clunky interface and limited reporting features. Strengths: Users laud CPQ's ability to handle complex product configurations with ease, highlighting its vast array of options and rules. They also appreciate its tight integration with other Infor products, streamlining workflows within the Infor ecosystem. For instance, one user notes, "It's a lifesaver for complex quotes with multiple variables. It ensures accuracy and saves us tons of time compared to manual processes." Weaknesses: The primary pain point seems to be the user interface. Many reviewers describe it as outdated, cumbersome, and hindering user adoption. Additionally, the lack of robust reporting capabilities frustrates users who need to analyze sales data and track performance metrics. One user comments, "The interface feels like it's stuck in the past, making it difficult to navigate and find what I need. And the reports are just basic – I need more insights to make informed decisions." Compared to competitors: Users often draw comparisons to Salesforce CPQ, praising its user-friendly interface and comprehensive reporting suite. However, they acknowledge CPQ's edge in handling intricate product configurations. One user says, "Salesforce CPQ is definitely more user-friendly, but it can't handle our complex products as well as CPQ. We had to choose between ease of use and functionality." Why these matter: The choice between CPQ and its competitors boils down to priorities. If your products are intricate and require powerful configuration capabilities, CPQ might be worth the steeper learning curve. But if a user-friendly interface and robust reporting are crucial, other options might be more suitable. Ultimately, understanding your specific needs and carefully considering user feedback is key to selecting the right CPQ software for your business.