Our analysts compared Maximo vs Aveva based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EAM Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all EAM Software
Maximo has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 978 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Aveva has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 10 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Maximo and concluded it deserves the award for the Best Overall EAM Software available today and earns best-in-class honors for Analytics and Reporting, Asset Tracking, Maintenance and Inspection Management and Mobile EAM.
Aveva stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
IBM Maximo Asset Management helps users perform preventive repairs to extend asset lifespans, monitor assets and equipment, manage contracts, and control inventory. It excels in asset management, tracking and reports. With an intuitive design, plenty of integrations and a high degree of customization, it provides flexibility and ease so users can get the most out of it. However, the UI can be difficult for new users and the cost for licensing is on the higher end. Reviews also cited difficulty with attachments and a complex implementation process as drawbacks. Overall, it’s a good fit for businesses looking for a CMMS with plenty of features that go far beyond asset management.
Let's dive into what users have been saying about this EAM software over the past year. Overall, Aveva seems to be a bit of a mixed bag, with some users singing its praises and others finding it falls short of expectations. On the plus side, Aveva gets kudos for its robust functionality and comprehensive feature set, particularly in areas like work order management, asset tracking, and preventive maintenance. Users appreciate the ability to streamline maintenance processes, improve asset reliability, and reduce downtime. The software's flexibility and customizability also get a thumbs-up, allowing organizations to tailor it to their specific needs and workflows. However, there are some thorns among the roses. Some users find the interface clunky and outdated, making it less user-friendly than some competitors. The learning curve can also be steep, requiring significant time and effort to get up to speed. Additionally, implementation can be complex and time-consuming, especially for larger organizations with intricate asset management needs. So, who is Aveva best suited for? It appears to be a good fit for larger enterprises in industries like oil and gas, utilities, and manufacturing, where complex asset management is critical. These organizations often have the resources and technical expertise to handle the implementation and learning curve, and they can benefit greatly from Aveva's powerful features and scalability. However, smaller businesses or those with simpler asset management needs might find Aveva to be overkill and may want to explore more user-friendly and affordable options.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...