Biztalk Server vs Cleo Integration Cloud

BizTalk Server is a powerful tool for businesses needing a robust and adaptable solution for Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) and application integration. Users appreciate its ability to handle complex data formats and its scalability, making it suitable for large organizations with diverse integration requirements. Its versatility allows for connecting various systems and applications, streamlining business processes. However, some users find BizTalk Server's complexity and steep learning curve to be drawbacks, especially for those seeking a simpler EDI solution. Additionally, while BizTalk Server offers a range of features, it may not be the most cost-effective option for smaller businesses with less complex integration needs. Compared to other integration platforms like MuleSoft Anypoint Platform or Boomi, BizTalk Server stands out with its deep integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, making it a natural choice for organizations heavily invested in Microsoft technologies. Its strength lies in handling complex integrations and orchestrations, but it may not be as user-friendly or cloud-native as some competitors. Ultimately, BizTalk Server is best suited for enterprises requiring a comprehensive and scalable solution for EDI and application integration, particularly those already utilizing Microsoft products and services. Its ability to manage intricate data formats and automate business processes makes it a valuable asset for organizations with complex integration challenges.

Cleo Integrated Cloud provides a robust suite of features and communication protocols. Users were satisfied with the accessibility and ease of configuration. The system supports FTP, SFTP and AS2 protocols, and its proxy server enables secure transactions. Users could leverage multiple schemas, such as Json, XML, EDI, Txt, MFT and API for data transformation and integration. Users specifically praised their customer support, mentioning that they take the time to resolve any problems that occur. Users found the system capable of real-time data exchange and processes. It also empowered better collaboration with options to collaborate on projects and numerous preconfigured connections. However, there were mixed reviews when it came to customization, with some claiming that the cloud-based system takes away some control. Some users experienced occasional performance and connectivity issues. Several issues were raised by a few reviewers, including difficulty in troubleshooting, limited reporting and analytics. Overall, it’s a robust application for connection management and mapping.