athenahealth vs Azalea Health

User reviews paint a compelling picture of athenaOne's strengths and weaknesses. Many users laud its intuitiveness and efficiency, comparing it favorably to Epic in particular. "Charting a patient in athenaOne takes half the time compared to Epic," one user shared, highlighting the streamlined interface. Another user raved about the integrated functionalities, stating, "The way athenaOne links billing and scheduling saves us so much time compared to our previous system, which kept everything siloed." However, some users expressed frustrations with limited customization options and occasional hiccups in customer support. "I wish athenaOne offered more granular control over customizing templates and workflows like you can in Epic," commented one user, seeking greater personalization. Another mentioned, "Customer support can be a mixed bag. While they're sometimes helpful and prompt, I've also had experiences with long wait times and inconsistent responses." Overall, user reviews suggest athenaOne shines in user-friendliness, comprehensive features, and workflow efficiency, rivaling even industry giants like Epic in these aspects. While some limitations around customization and support exist, athenaOne remains a strong contender in the EHR market, offering a user-friendly and feature-rich experience for healthcare providers looking to optimize their practice operations.

Azalea health is a cloud-based solution that stands out amongst its competitors, but user reviews present both promising strengths and concerning weaknesses. It's known for its intuitive interface, customizable dashboards, secure patient portal and mobile accessibility. However, challenges persist with its scheduling module's complexity and platform performance issues, with significant dissatisfaction reported regarding the support team's responsiveness. Despite its reported cons, Azalea is a good fit for customers looking to streamline routine admin tasks and enhance revenue and profitability.