Top Care360 EHR Alternatives & Competitors For 2024

Care360 EHR has in the past received high marks for its user-friendliness and comprehensive features, once making it a popular choice among healthcare organizations. Users appreciate the intuitive interface and the wide range of functionalities, such as patient record management, billing, and scheduling, which streamline workflows and improve efficiency. The e-prescribing system is a standout feature, lauded for its accuracy and convenience. Additionally, Care360 EHR's compliance with industry standards, including meaningful use stages one and two, ensures that healthcare providers meet regulatory requirements. However, some users have expressed concerns about the cost of the system and occasional slow performance. Despite these drawbacks, the overall sentiment towards Care360 EHR is positive, with users praising its ease of use, robust features, and excellent support from the Quest Diagnostics team. Care360 EHR is best suited for healthcare organizations seeking a comprehensive and user-friendly EHR system. Its ability to handle a wide range of tasks makes it ideal for organizations of all sizes, from small independent practices to large multi-specialty groups. The system's scalability and flexibility allow it to adapt to the evolving needs of healthcare providers, ensuring that they have the tools they need to deliver high-quality patient care.

The core functionality of eClinicalWorks is suitable for most medical practices and comes at a fair price. However, many users felt that they were oversold on the product by the sales team. Many users complained of difficulty using the features they needed, and felt that the system interface made it difficult to navigate. Users reported issues with system bugs and were unable to receive sufficient support from the support team to rectify the issues they experienced, despite access to 24/7 support. Some users noted that customer support is outsourced and complained that a language barrier made it difficult to communicate. Ultimately, eClinicalWorks is best suited for small practices with basic EHR needs, though it may take users a few days to learn the system.

User reviews from the past year paint a mixed picture. While some users praise its intuitive design and comprehensive features, others express frustration with its customer support and pricing. Practice Fusion stands out for its user-friendly interface, which makes navigating the system a breeze, especially for those new to electronic health records. Its robust feature set, including charting, e-prescribing, and billing, caters to a wide range of practice needs. However, some users report encountering difficulties with customer support, finding it unresponsive and unhelpful. Additionally, pricing concerns have been raised, with some users finding the system expensive compared to competitors like Athenahealth or Kareo. Overall, Practice Fusion seems best suited for smaller practices seeking a user-friendly, all-in-one EHR solution. However, practices with more complex needs or those prioritizing responsive customer support might want to explore alternative options.

AdvancedMD is an intuitive cloud-based tool. While some users were happy with the system’s integration and customization capabilities, far more users were extremely dissatisfied with other aspects of the system. There were mixed reviews on its reporting capabilities. A significant number of reviewers felt that the sales representatives misled customers noting that they lost money after implementing AdvancedMD and commenting that many features lacked the functionality that they required. Though the add-ons allow users to customize the system, many users complained that the add-ons come at a steep price, making them prohibitive to many users. Users also complained that they were surprised by hidden fees after implementation and felt that customer service was rude and unwilling to help when they called for support. A small number of reviews also noted that upgrades to the system frequently caused downtime and reported discrepancies in their billing that affected customers. While many of the reviews were negative, AdvancedMD remains a popular EHR solution. Due to its high price and difficulty to learn, it is best suited to large practices with the budget for necessary add-ons and internal technical support that is available to help ensure everyone who needs to can use the system.

User reviews paint a compelling picture of athenaOne's strengths and weaknesses. Many users laud its intuitiveness and efficiency, comparing it favorably to Epic in particular. "Charting a patient in athenaOne takes half the time compared to Epic," one user shared, highlighting the streamlined interface. Another user raved about the integrated functionalities, stating, "The way athenaOne links billing and scheduling saves us so much time compared to our previous system, which kept everything siloed." However, some users expressed frustrations with limited customization options and occasional hiccups in customer support. "I wish athenaOne offered more granular control over customizing templates and workflows like you can in Epic," commented one user, seeking greater personalization. Another mentioned, "Customer support can be a mixed bag. While they're sometimes helpful and prompt, I've also had experiences with long wait times and inconsistent responses." Overall, user reviews suggest athenaOne shines in user-friendliness, comprehensive features, and workflow efficiency, rivaling even industry giants like Epic in these aspects. While some limitations around customization and support exist, athenaOne remains a strong contender in the EHR market, offering a user-friendly and feature-rich experience for healthcare providers looking to optimize their practice operations.