Our analysts compared Meditech vs Practice EHR based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EHR Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all EHR Software
Meditech has a 'fair' User Satisfaction Rating of 63% when considering 154 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Practice EHR has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 85% when considering 35 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Meditech and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Clinical Documentation.
Meditech is an intuitive EHR solution to streamline charting, documentation and patient data retrieval. Reviewers found the system simplified to a fault. Users found that it helps keep information neatly and securely organized, resulting in a smooth user experience. Without overwhelming clients, the platform enables ease of use and navigation. It also increases treatment accuracy by predicting diagnosis. However, others complained that its lack of features limited its functionality. It provides minimal charting options. It also lacks an assessment entry field, dot phase or auto-populate preset features. Its notifications are easy to miss. Being a web-based application, it’s not optimized for smartphones or mobile devices. The system can lag when dealing with high volumes. Overall, it’s not a comprehensive solution, but it streamlines clinical workflows with its suite of features.
Is Practice EHR the "practice" EHR for your practice? Recent user reviews suggest that Practice EHR is a strong contender in the EHR market, particularly for smaller practices looking for a comprehensive and user-friendly solution. Users consistently praise Practice EHR for its intuitive interface, which simplifies complex tasks like charting and billing. One user even compared it to a popular ride-sharing app, stating, "It's as easy to use as ordering an Uber." This ease of use is a major differentiating factor for Practice EHR, as many competing EHRs are known for their steep learning curves. However, Practice EHR is not without its drawbacks. Some users have reported limitations with the reporting features, finding them less robust than those offered by competitors like Epic or Cerner. This limitation could be a dealbreaker for larger practices or those requiring highly specialized reporting capabilities. Overall, Practice EHR appears to be a good fit for smaller practices that prioritize ease of use and affordability over advanced reporting features. Its intuitive design and comprehensive functionality make it a practical choice for practices looking to streamline their operations and improve patient care without breaking the bank.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...