Looking for alternatives to NueMD? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Clinical Charts, Clinical Documentation, and Platform Security and Compliance. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real EHR Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of NueMD to leading industry alternatives like eClinicalWorks, eMDs, Nextech, and athenahealth.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
NueMD is a comprehensive software solution designed to streamline various administrative and clinical tasks for healthcare providers. It excels in managing electronic health records (EHR), medical billing, and practice management. This software is particularly well-suited for small to mid-sized medical practices, as it offers an intuitive interface and robust functionality that can handle the complexities of healthcare administration without overwhelming users.
One of the key benefits of NueMD is its ability to improve workflow efficiency, thereby allowing healthcare professionals to focus more on patient care. Popular features include customizable templates, real-time claim tracking, and integrated scheduling. Users often highlight its ease of use and the quality of customer support as significant advantages.
In terms of pricing, NueMD typically operates on a subscription model, with costs varying based on the number of users and specific features required. This makes it a flexible option for practices of different sizes and needs. Compared to similar products, NueMD is frequently praised for its user-friendly design and comprehensive feature set, making it a strong contender in the EHR market.
among all EHR Software
NueMD has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 485 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
eClinicalWorks has a 'fair' User Satisfaction Rating of 68% when considering 523 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
eMDs has a 'poor' User Satisfaction Rating of 51% when considering 39 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Nextech has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 79% when considering 318 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
athenahealth has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 75% when considering 953 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
NueMD is a cloud-based practice management software that offers a suite of features, including medical billing, electronic health records (EHR), and appointment scheduling. While NueMD has been a popular choice for some practices, user reviews from the past year suggest that it may not be the best fit for everyone. One of the biggest strengths of NueMD is its comprehensive suite of features. Users praise the software's ability to handle everything from billing to scheduling, making it a one-stop shop for practice management. However, some users have expressed concerns about the software's user interface, which they find clunky and difficult to navigate. They also complain that the software is not as intuitive as other EHR systems on the market, such as Athenahealth or Kareo. NueMD's customer support has also been a point of contention, with some users reporting long wait times and unhelpful responses. NueMD's biggest differentiator is its focus on medical billing. The software's billing features are highly regarded by users, who appreciate its ability to streamline the billing process and reduce the number of errors. However, NueMD's billing features are not without their drawbacks. Some users have reported that the software's billing system is not as flexible as other systems on the market, making it difficult to customize for specific practice needs. Overall, NueMD is a solid EHR system that offers a comprehensive suite of features. However, its clunky user interface, lack of intuitive design, and inconsistent customer support may make it a less desirable option for some practices. NueMD is best suited for practices that are looking for a system with strong billing features and are willing to put in the time and effort to learn the software. It is important to note that AdvancedMD, the company behind NueMD, is sunsetting the software in 2025. This means that practices using NueMD will need to migrate to a different system in the near future.
The core functionality of eClinicalWorks is suitable for most medical practices and comes at a fair price. However, many users felt that they were oversold on the product by the sales team. Many users complained of difficulty using the features they needed, and felt that the system interface made it difficult to navigate. Users reported issues with system bugs and were unable to receive sufficient support from the support team to rectify the issues they experienced, despite access to 24/7 support. Some users noted that customer support is outsourced and complained that a language barrier made it difficult to communicate. Ultimately, eClinicalWorks is best suited for small practices with basic EHR needs, though it may take users a few days to learn the system.
Reviews from the past year highlight both the good and the not-so-good, giving us a clear picture of where eMDs shines and where it falls short. Users rave about its user-friendly interface, especially for scheduling and charting, making it a breeze for healthcare pros to navigate. The robust reporting features are another big plus, allowing for easy data analysis and informed decision-making. However, eMDs isn't without its quirks. Some users find the system a bit clunky and report occasional glitches and slowdowns. Plus, the customer support experience seems to be a mixed bag, with some users praising its responsiveness while others find it lacking. So, who's the ideal candidate for eMDs? It seems to be a good fit for small to medium-sized practices looking for a user-friendly EHR with solid reporting capabilities. But, if top-notch customer support and a seamless, glitch-free experience are your top priorities, you might want to explore other options. Keep in mind, the tech world is always evolving, so it's a good idea to check out the latest reviews and updates before making your final decision.
Nextech, a comprehensive practice management solution designed to streamline workflows for specialty practices, has elicited a range of feedback from users over the past year. While opinions on the platform's efficacy vary, several recurring themes emerge from user reviews, shedding light on its strengths, weaknesses, and ideal user base. Nextech's robust features and customizability are frequently cited as major advantages. Users appreciate the platform's ability to adapt to the specific needs of different specialties, with tools for appointment scheduling, billing, and electronic health records (EHR) management. The platform's integration with other software systems is also highlighted as a strength, enabling seamless data exchange and reducing manual data entry. However, some users find the extensive customization options overwhelming, leading to a steep learning curve and implementation challenges. Nextech's EHR functionality receives mixed reviews. Some users praise its comprehensive features, such as charting, e-prescribing, and patient portal access. Others express concerns about the EHR's user interface, citing issues with navigation and data entry. Additionally, while Nextech offers a mobile app, its functionality is limited compared to the desktop version, which can be inconvenient for users who require on-the-go access. In comparison to similar products, Nextech stands out for its specialization in serving the needs of specialty practices. Its features and workflows are tailored to address the unique challenges faced by these practices, such as complex billing requirements and specialized clinical documentation. This focus on specialty practices differentiates Nextech from more generic practice management solutions. Considering its strengths and weaknesses, Nextech appears best suited for larger specialty practices with dedicated IT resources and a willingness to invest time in implementation and training. The platform's extensive features and customizability can provide significant value to these practices, but may overwhelm smaller practices with limited resources.
User reviews paint a compelling picture of athenaOne's strengths and weaknesses. Many users laud its intuitiveness and efficiency, comparing it favorably to Epic in particular. "Charting a patient in athenaOne takes half the time compared to Epic," one user shared, highlighting the streamlined interface. Another user raved about the integrated functionalities, stating, "The way athenaOne links billing and scheduling saves us so much time compared to our previous system, which kept everything siloed." However, some users expressed frustrations with limited customization options and occasional hiccups in customer support. "I wish athenaOne offered more granular control over customizing templates and workflows like you can in Epic," commented one user, seeking greater personalization. Another mentioned, "Customer support can be a mixed bag. While they're sometimes helpful and prompt, I've also had experiences with long wait times and inconsistent responses." Overall, user reviews suggest athenaOne shines in user-friendliness, comprehensive features, and workflow efficiency, rivaling even industry giants like Epic in these aspects. While some limitations around customization and support exist, athenaOne remains a strong contender in the EHR market, offering a user-friendly and feature-rich experience for healthcare providers looking to optimize their practice operations.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...