MangoApps vs Staffbase
Last Updated:Our analysts compared MangoApps vs Staffbase based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Employee Experience Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Product Basics
Product Assistance
Product Insights
Product Ranking
Analyst Rating Summary
Analyst Ratings for Functional Requirements Customize This Data Customize This Data
Analyst Ratings for Technical Requirements Customize This Data Customize This Data
User Sentiment Summary
MangoApps has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 136 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
Staffbase has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 96% when considering 66 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
Awards
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated MangoApps and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Learning and Development, Performance Management, Platform Capabilities and Performance and Scalability.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Staffbase and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Employee Feedback and Surveys and Integration and Extensibility. Staffbase stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Synopsis of User Ratings and Reviews
Is MangoApps the apple of your employees' eyes, or does it leave them feeling like they've bitten into a sour grape? User reviews from the past year paint a largely positive picture of MangoApps, highlighting its strengths in fostering a unified employee experience. Users consistently praise its intuitive interface, drawing parallels to popular social media platforms, which makes adoption smooth and encourages engagement. This user-friendliness extends to its robust customization options, allowing companies to tailor the platform to their specific branding and needs, making it feel like an organic extension of their existing systems. A notable strength is its comprehensive search functionality, powered by generative AI, which allows employees to quickly locate information, a feature that users often find lacking in competitors like WorkVivo.However, some drawbacks have been identified, primarily concerning integrations. Users express frustration over the difficulties encountered when integrating MangoApps with Outlook for calendar synchronization, a limitation that hinders seamless workflow. The absence of a built-in video calling feature also poses a disadvantage, particularly in today's remote-heavy work environments, where real-time video communication is crucial. Despite these shortcomings, MangoApps is lauded for its effectiveness in streamlining communication and collaboration, especially for distributed teams. Its ability to centralize information, facilitate knowledge sharing through features like its wiki module, and enhance communication through private messaging makes it a valuable tool for organizations seeking to bridge the gap between remote and in-office employees.Overall, MangoApps emerges as a strong contender in the employee experience platform arena, best suited for organizations prioritizing internal communication, engagement, and knowledge sharing. Its intuitive design, robust customization, and comprehensive search capabilities make it an attractive option, particularly for companies with a large remote workforce. However, the integration hurdles and lack of video conferencing capabilities are factors to consider, especially for businesses heavily reliant on these features.
Is Staffbase a communication home run, or does it strike out? User reviews from the last year paint a largely positive picture of Staffbase as an employee communication platform, particularly for large, dispersed organizations. Its standout strength lies in its user-friendliness, with reviewers consistently praising its intuitive interface and ease of use, even for tech-averse employees. This is a significant differentiating factor, as it reduces the reliance on IT support and empowers communication teams to manage content independently. For instance, users highlight the simplicity of creating and disseminating content, from company news and updates to surveys and forms, all within a streamlined platform. However, some users point out that while Staffbase excels in basic communication features, certain functionalities, like the calendar plugin, lack sophistication and may fall short of replacing existing solutions. This suggests that while Staffbase provides a solid foundation for internal communication, organizations with highly specialized needs might find certain aspects limiting. Despite this, the overall sentiment leans positive, with many users emphasizing the platform's robust analytics dashboard, which provides valuable insights into content engagement and communication effectiveness. This data-driven approach empowers communication teams to tailor their strategies and demonstrate the impact of their efforts. In conclusion, Staffbase emerges as a strong contender for organizations seeking to streamline their internal communications, particularly those with a large, deskless workforce. Its intuitive design, coupled with robust analytics, makes it a valuable tool for reaching every employee, regardless of location. However, companies with highly specialized requirements should carefully evaluate their needs against Staffbase's functionalities to ensure a perfect fit.
Screenshots
Top Alternatives in Employee Experience Software
Akumina
Beekeeper
Blink
DeskAlerts
Firstup
Happeo
Igloo Software
Interact Software
Jostle
LumApps
Microsoft Viva
Simpplr
Staffbase
Unily
WorkForce Software
Workvivo
Related Categories
FAQ
We’re the employee-owned Austin-based startup democratizing software data so you can make your decisions in an influence-free zone. Our market data is crowdsourced from our user-base of 100,000+ companies.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...