Our analysts compared eClinicalWorks vs MEDHOST based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EMR Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
MEDHOST provides a comprehensive suite of healthcare management software solutions, including an Electronic Health Records (EHR) system designed to support the operational and clinical needs of hospitals and healthcare facilities. This software is particularly well-suited for healthcare providers looking for an integrated approach to patient care and hospital management, offering a seamless experience for both clinicians and administrative staff. Among its key benefits are improved patient safety, enhanced communication across departments, and streamlined workflows, which collectively contribute to better patient outcomes. Popular features of MEDHOST include its intuitive user interface, robust data analytics, and customizable modules that cater to various specialties. When compared to similar products, users often highlight MEDHOST's reliability and the supportive customer service as distinguishing factors. Pricing for MEDHOST can vary based on the specific needs and size of the healthcare facility, typically involving a subscription model that may include upfront costs for implementation and ongoing fees for support and updates.
among all EMR Software
eClinicalWorks has a 'fair' User Satisfaction Rating of 68% when considering 523 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
The core functionality of eClinicalWorks is suitable for most medical practices and comes at a fair price. However, many users felt that they were oversold on the product by the sales team. Many users complained of difficulty using the features they needed, and felt that the system interface made it difficult to navigate. Users reported issues with system bugs and were unable to receive sufficient support from the support team to rectify the issues they experienced, despite access to 24/7 support. Some users noted that customer support is outsourced and complained that a language barrier made it difficult to communicate. Ultimately, eClinicalWorks is best suited for small practices with basic EHR needs, though it may take users a few days to learn the system.
Is MEDHOST the host with the most when it comes to EHR solutions? User reviews from the past year suggest a mixed bag. While many appreciate the platform's user-friendly design, allowing even the least tech-savvy staff members to navigate with ease, and its comprehensive suite of features covering everything from patient scheduling to billing, some find its cost prohibitive, especially for smaller practices. A standout feature for many is the mobile app, which allows access to patient records from anywhere, a major plus in today's fast-paced world. However, some users have reported issues with customer support, finding it difficult to get timely assistance when problems arise. Compared to competitors like Epic or Cerner, MEDHOST seems to carve its niche by focusing on ease of use and a more streamlined feature set. This makes it a good fit for smaller to mid-sized practices who may not need the extensive (and often complex) functionalities of larger systems. Think of it as choosing a reliable sedan over a feature-packed SUV - it gets the job done without the unnecessary bells and whistles. However, those needing highly specialized features or extensive customization might find MEDHOST limiting. Ultimately, MEDHOST seems best suited for practices prioritizing user-friendliness and a good balance of essential features over a sprawling, complex system.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...