Kaspersky Endpoint Security For Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

User reviews of Kaspersky Endpoint Security For Business showcase a mix of strengths and weaknesses. One prominent strength lies in its robust threat protection capabilities. Users consistently praise its effectiveness in detecting and mitigating a wide array of cyber threats, including malware and ransomware. The centralized management console is another highlight, making security administration more straightforward by allowing policy configuration and monitoring from a single interface. Real-time updates for threat intelligence and antivirus signatures contribute to its strong security posture. However, there are notable weaknesses as well. Some users find the software resource-intensive, potentially causing performance issues on older hardware. The complexity of configuration can be overwhelming for IT administrators, particularly those with limited experience. Additionally, while Kaspersky generally maintains low false positives, occasional false detections can disrupt operations. The cost, compared to other solutions, is considered higher by some, which may be a drawback for smaller organizations. In comparison to similar products, Kaspersky Endpoint Security For Business often stands out for its strong threat protection and centralized management. However, users stress the importance of ensuring compatibility with existing software and addressing the learning curve associated with its feature-rich interface. Overall, it is well-received for its security effectiveness but may require careful consideration of resources and costs.

User reviews for Symantec Endpoint Security Complete reflect a mix of strengths and weaknesses. Users consistently praise its robust threat protection capabilities, including effective malware and phishing attack detection. The user-friendly interface and centralized cloud-based management are commonly appreciated, making it accessible and convenient for administrators. The solution's quick threat detection and response, along with seamless integration between endpoint and email security, receive positive feedback for enhancing overall security. On the downside, some users find the product to be resource-intensive, potentially affecting system performance on older devices. Complex initial configuration and potential compatibility issues with third-party software are reported challenges. Cost is cited as a drawback for smaller organizations with limited budgets. While the automation features are well-received, the product may occasionally generate false positives, requiring manual intervention. Users generally view Symantec Endpoint Security Complete favorably when compared to similar products, particularly due to its comprehensive threat protection and integration capabilities. However, some mention limitations in mobile device support and the need for careful policy adjustment to avoid impacting user experience. The product's commitment to compliance support and 24/7 threat monitoring and support also contribute positively to user satisfaction.