Looking for alternatives to Jedox? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Cash Management, Reports and Dashboards, and Profitability Modelling and Analysis. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real EPM Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of Jedox to leading industry alternatives like Oracle EPM, Essbase, Prophix, and SAP Profitability and Performance Management.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all EPM Software
Jedox has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 88% when considering 226 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Essbase has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 82% when considering 444 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Prophix has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 91% when considering 160 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
SAP Profitability and Performance Management has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 100% when considering 2 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
Jedox has garnered a reputation for its robust data modeling capabilities and Excel integration, making it a popular choice for organizations with existing Excel-based processes. Users appreciate the familiar interface and the ability to leverage their existing Excel skills, reducing the learning curve and facilitating user adoption. The platform's strength lies in its ability to handle complex calculations and data manipulations, making it suitable for financial planning, budgeting, and forecasting tasks. However, some users find the interface outdated and less intuitive compared to modern cloud-based solutions. Additionally, while Jedox offers cloud deployment options, its on-premise roots can lead to challenges with scalability and accessibility for remote teams. When compared to competitors like Anaplan and Adaptive Insights, Jedox stands out with its powerful OLAP engine and Excel integration. This makes it a preferred choice for organizations that prioritize data analysis and manipulation capabilities. However, Jedox may fall short in terms of user-friendliness and collaboration features, where cloud-native platforms often excel. The platform's pricing structure, which can be complex and involve multiple components, is another factor that potential users should carefully consider. Ultimately, Jedox is best suited for organizations with strong Excel expertise and a need for advanced data modeling and analytical capabilities, particularly in finance and controlling departments.
User reviews for Oracle EPM paint a mixed picture, highlighting both its strengths and weaknesses. Many users praise its ability to automate tasks, streamline processes, and provide real-time insights, leading to improved efficiency and accuracy. They also value its ability to facilitate collaboration across departments and its centralized view of financial data, which fosters better decision-making. One user commented, "EPM has completely transformed our financial close process, reducing our closing time by 50%." Others appreciate how EPM helps them comply with complex regulations, with one user stating, "EPM has saved us countless hours and resources by automating our compliance reporting." However, some users find EPM's initial setup and configuration to be challenging and time-consuming. The cost can also be a barrier for smaller businesses. Additionally, the steep learning curve requires users to invest significant time and resources in training. Some users also expressed frustration with EPM's limited customization options and the challenges they faced integrating it with other systems. One user noted, "While EPM offers a lot of features, it can be inflexible at times and doesn't always meet our specific needs." Another user commented, "Integrating EPM with our existing ERP system was a major headache." When comparing EPM to similar products like SAP BPC and Anaplan, users often highlight EPM's comprehensive feature set, robust security measures, and seamless integration with other Oracle applications as its main differentiating factors. However, some users find SAP BPC to be more user-friendly and Anaplan to be more agile and adaptable. Ultimately, the best choice for individual users and businesses depends on their specific needs and priorities.
Essbase is a multidimensional database with a fast querying engine and an intuitive interface. Available both in the cloud or on-premises, it enables users to build and manage analytic applications, which can be migrated to the cloud. It features a robust set of tools to perform planning, forecasting and analytics. Users can slice and dice intersections easily to find specific data. It can be integrated with Excel, enabling users to build budget and forecasting models, with ad hoc reporting capabilities. Users liked the flexibility offered when designing reports, or changing hierarchies. With access to all optimization and tuning options, users are given control of hardware utilizations and other settings. However, users complained that they needed to learn multiple languages, such as Calc scripts, MDX, business rules and Groovy, to leverage the platform’s capabilities. They also found it difficult to export data or integrate it with a data warehouse. Some users reported performance and stability issues, with rare instances of crashes and connection loss. Reviewers also complained about the low level of support provided when critical tickets are submitted, some of which are closed without providing any solution. Overall, it’s a flexible solution with a powerful calculation engine to drive business insights.
Prophix has received generally positive feedback from users over the past year, with many praising its ease of use and intuitive interface. Users with limited technical expertise found the software easy to navigate and perform tasks, such as budgeting, forecasting, and reporting. The drag-and-drop functionality and pre-built templates were particularly helpful for streamlining workflows and reducing manual data entry. Reviewers frequently compared Prophix to other EPM software options like Oracle Hyperion and SAP BPC, noting that Prophix offered a more user-friendly experience at a more affordable price point. While Prophix's user-friendliness is a significant advantage, some users noted limitations in its advanced functionality compared to more comprehensive EPM solutions. For example, complex financial modeling and scenario analysis may require additional customization or integrations with other tools. Additionally, some users expressed a desire for more robust data visualization and reporting capabilities. Despite these limitations, Prophix's core strengths lie in its ability to simplify and automate essential EPM tasks for mid-sized businesses. Its affordability and ease of use make it an attractive option for organizations seeking to improve their financial planning and analysis processes without the complexity and cost associated with enterprise-level EPM solutions. Overall, Prophix appears to be well-suited for mid-sized businesses and departments within larger organizations that require a user-friendly and affordable EPM solution. Its intuitive interface, pre-built templates, and core functionalities cater to the needs of users with varying levels of technical expertise. While it may not offer the same level of advanced functionality as some of its competitors, its ease of use and affordability make it a valuable tool for organizations looking to streamline their financial planning and analysis processes.
Can SAP Profitability and Performance Management make your business perform better, or is it just a lot of hype? User reviews from the last year reveal a mixed bag. On the plus side, SAP Profitability & Performance Management consistently wows users with its robust financial analytics and ability to handle complex cost allocations, such as step-down allocations for warranty reserve management, without breaking a sweat. This, coupled with its lightning-fast performance on the SAP HANA platform, makes it a darling for businesses dealing with large data volumes and intricate calculations. Users especially love how it simplifies financial planning and reporting, allowing them to generate detailed insights and make data-driven decisions faster. The software's integration with other SAP systems, like SAP ERP, is also praised for streamlining data flow. However, it's not all sunshine and roses. The learning curve is steep, and users frequently cite the need for extensive training during implementation due to the system's complexity. One user even compared it to learning a new language! The lack of comprehensive documentation only adds fuel to the fire, leaving users feeling lost and frustrated. Additionally, while not a deal-breaker, some users have reported encountering occasional bugs and quirks that require attention. For example, the connectivity with SAP Analytics Cloud, while promised, is still in development, limiting its full potential. Despite these hiccups, SAP Profitability & Performance Management stands out from its predecessor, SAP PCM, and other similar products with its superior flexibility, enhanced performance, and advanced simulation capabilities. The visual modeling and step-by-step data transformation functions are particularly noteworthy, providing crystal-clear insights and simplifying model maintenance. This makes it ideal for businesses looking to ditch error-prone spreadsheets and embrace a more robust, transparent, and repeatable process for profitability and performance management. In conclusion, SAP Profitability & Performance Management is a powerful tool, best suited for large enterprises with complex business processes and a dedicated IT team to support implementation and training. While it requires a significant investment of time and resources upfront, the long-term benefits in terms of improved profitability, streamlined financial planning, and data-driven decision-making are undeniable.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...