Our analysts compared ServSuite vs FieldAware based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Field Service Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all Field Service Management Software
FieldAware has a 'fair' User Satisfaction Rating of 66% when considering 62 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
Some users sing its praises, highlighting its comprehensive features like scheduling, routing, and customer management as major strengths, especially when compared to competitors with less integrated systems. They particularly appreciate the robust reporting tools and seamless integration capabilities with other business software. However, a sour note emerges with the user interface, often criticized as outdated and clunky. This complexity contributes to a steep learning curve, making it challenging for new users to quickly adapt and utilize the software effectively. While some find customer support helpful, others report delays and unhelpful responses, leaving them frustrated and in a bind. ServSuite seems best suited for larger pest control businesses with the resources and technical expertise to navigate its complexities and leverage its powerful features. Smaller companies or those seeking a more intuitive, user-friendly experience may find ServSuite's learning curve and occasional performance hiccups a significant drawback.
Is FieldAware software really as keen as it seems in the field service management arena? User reviews from the past year reveal a mixed bag. On the upside, FieldAware consistently earns praise for its user-friendly interface, particularly for field technicians who find it intuitive and easy to navigate. This ease of use extends to features like scheduling, dispatching, and time tracking, streamlining daily operations for field teams. Users also appreciate the software's ability to improve back-office efficiency, citing faster invoicing and more detailed job records as key benefits. However, FieldAware isn't without its drawbacks. Some users point to limitations in reporting features, making it difficult to extract in-depth insights from their data. Occasional issues with customer support have also been reported, potentially hindering timely problem resolution. Moreover, FieldAware has been criticized for lacking certain advanced features found in competitors like ServiceTitan, such as automated customer communication tools. For instance, one user pointed out the absence of automatic text message notifications for customers when a technician is on the way. Overall, FieldAware appears best-suited for small to mid-sized businesses with mobile workforces seeking a user-friendly solution for managing core field service operations. Its strengths lie in its intuitive interface, efficient scheduling and dispatching capabilities, and seamless integration with other business software like QuickBooks. However, companies requiring robust reporting features or seeking more advanced automation capabilities might find FieldAware lacking and should explore alternative options.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...