Our analysts compared JazzHR vs Built for Teams based on data from our 400+ point analysis of HR Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all HR Management Software
JazzHR has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 1316 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Built for Teams has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 1222 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Built for Teams stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
JazzHR is a solution for companies looking for help with recruitment and other related HR tasks. It offers a simple, intuitive interface, which is good for new users as they can easily learn and start using it. Syndicated job postings is another pro that many users highlight. Customer support is quick and effective as well. However, lack of a mobile app and inadequate templates for reports are two considerable drawbacks. Lastly, it lacks several important features offered by competing platforms. Small and medium businesses that can do without a mobile app and are strictly looking for recruiting capabilities may find it a good option.
Is Built for Teams actually built for teams? User reviews from the last year suggest that while Built for Teams offers a solid foundation for HR processes, it may not be the most robust or feature-rich compared to competitors like BambooHR or Namely. Users appreciate the platform's intuitive design and ease of use, particularly for core HR functions like managing employee data, tracking time off, and approving requests. The shared calendar feature, allowing employees to visualize leave time, is frequently cited as a major plus. However, some users find the reporting functionality limited and crave more customization options. Others express a desire for more advanced features, such as performance management tools with in-depth feedback mechanisms or more sophisticated compensation management capabilities. Essentially, Built for Teams seems best suited for smaller organizations or those with relatively straightforward HR needs. Its strength lies in simplifying core HR tasks and centralizing employee information. However, companies with complex requirements or a desire for granular control over HR processes might find Built for Teams lacking. They may be better served exploring alternatives that offer a broader and deeper range of functionalities.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...