Paycom vs Workable

Paycom users in the past year have expressed both enthusiasm and concerns about the software. Many praise its user-friendly interface, mobile app convenience, and comprehensive feature set, which includes payroll, HR, benefits administration, and talent management. Compared to competitors, users find Paycom to be more intuitive and integrated, streamlining HR processes and saving time. Additionally, customer service is often lauded as responsive and helpful. However, some drawbacks are also mentioned. Implementation can be complex and require significant initial effort. Pricing concerns surface, with Paycom perceived as costlier than some competitors. While offering a wider range of features, this may not be necessary for all businesses, leading to potential overpaying for unused functionalities. Overall, Paycom seems to be a powerful and user-friendly option for companies seeking a one-stop HR and payroll solution. However, its complexity and cost warrant careful consideration, especially for smaller businesses or those with simpler needs. Comparing features and pricing with competitors is crucial to ensure Paycom aligns with your specific requirements and budget.

Workable is a recruiting solution that provides a range of hiring tools. Users who commented on the platform said it was efficient and saved time and effort with its automated processes. Reviewers liked the UI and said it was easy to learn and adopt and had overwhelmingly positive experiences with the prompt and knowledgeable customer service. They felt the reporting worked well and delivered the necessary data to plan strategically. Above all, they were impressed with the recruiting functionality and especially liked the ATS, one-click job posting and talent acquisition and sourcing features. Hiring managers especially found it beneficial. In terms of issues and opportunities for growth, users consistently had problems attaching and grouping additional files with the candidate profile. They state it was difficult to centralize documents other than resumes such as certifications, samples, letters of recommendation and more. Some also felt that the overall customization and branding was somewhat limited. Last, workers reported difficulty getting everyone’s feed together in group settings on the platform. Workable may be a good fit for medium-sized organizations, especially those with hiring managers, who need to automate the recruiting process. Larger companies may find it too limiting. It may also be a good fit for small companies with the necessary budget; many found it quite affordable.