Top Cisco Duo Alternatives & Competitors For 2024
Last Updated:Looking for alternatives to Cisco Duo? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Identity Lifecycle Management, Platform Capabilities, and Password Management. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real IAM Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of Cisco Duo to leading industry alternatives like Auth0, Cloud Identity, ADManager Plus, and Entra ID.
Product Basics
Request for Free
Request for Free
Request for Free
Request for Free
Request for Free
Product Assistance
Product Ranking
#7
among all
IAM Software
#5
among all
IAM Software
#18
among all
IAM Software
#17
among all
IAM Software
#9
among all
IAM Software
Analyst Rating Summary
Analyst Ratings for Functional Requirements Customize This Data Customize This Data
Analyst Ratings for Technical Requirements Customize This Data Customize This Data
User Sentiment Summary
Auth0 has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 88% when considering 239 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Cloud Identity has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 91% when considering 24 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
ADManager Plus has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 92% when considering 384 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Awards
Synopsis of User Ratings and Reviews
Is Cisco Duo the dynamic duo of identity security, or does it leave users singing the authentication blues? User reviews from the past year reveal a product that, while generally well-regarded, has a few sour notes. Cisco Duo shines brightest in its multi-factor authentication (MFA) capabilities and user-friendly interface. Users rave about the smooth integration with platforms like Azure Active Directory and AWS, making it a breeze to manage access across a sprawling digital landscape. The mobile app, with its push notifications for swift verification, earns consistent praise. One user, a Solutions Architect, highlighted the ease of deployment and onboarding as a major plus. Think of it like this: Duo is the seasoned orchestra conductor, effortlessly coordinating various instruments (your applications and devices) to create a harmonious and secure symphony of access. However, no orchestra is without its occasional off-key note. Some users have pointed out the need for improved compatibility with other vendors and a more robust Smart Licensing system. A few have also voiced concerns about privacy, a valid consideration in today's data-driven world. While Duo offers a free trial and tiered subscription plans, some users find the pricing less than harmonious compared to competitors like Okta. Overall, Cisco Duo emerges as a strong contender in the identity security arena, best suited for organizations seeking robust MFA, a user-friendly experience, and seamless integration with popular platforms. While a few areas could benefit from fine-tuning, Duo's strengths resonate strongly with users, making it a reliable choice for bolstering security posture.
Is Auth0 the "auth"enticity your business needs to manage user access? User reviews from the last year reveal a mixed bag. Auth0 is praised for its robust security features, including multi-factor authentication and single sign-on, which are essential for protecting sensitive data and streamlining user access. Its ease of integration with various platforms and applications is also a major plus, as it simplifies the development process. For example, one user highlighted the straightforward setup of social login connections, allowing for quick integration into websites and mobile apps. However, some users have expressed concerns about Auth0's pricing structure, which can be complex and expensive, particularly for smaller businesses or projects with limited budgets. Additionally, while Auth0 offers extensive documentation and support, some users have reported difficulties with the user interface for developing custom login screens, finding it clunky and unintuitive. This could pose a challenge for businesses seeking a highly customized user experience. Despite these drawbacks, Auth0's reliability, scalability, and comprehensive features make it a suitable choice for businesses of all sizes looking to outsource their identity and access management needs. Its ability to handle a large volume of users and transactions, coupled with its strong security measures, provides peace of mind for businesses dealing with sensitive user data.
Can Google Cloud Identity help my business climb the ladder of success? Recent user reviews suggest that Google Cloud Identity is a solid choice for businesses already entrenched in the Google ecosystem, but may leave something to be desired for those seeking more flexibility. Users rave about its seamless integration with other Google services, like Google Workspace and Cloud Platform, which allows for centralized user and access management. This means businesses can easily manage users, devices, and applications all in one place, saving time and reducing administrative headaches. Users also appreciate the robust security features, such as single sign-on (SSO) and multi-factor authentication (MFA), which provide an added layer of protection against unauthorized access. However, some users find the platform's configuration options to be somewhat limited, particularly when it comes to setting up custom alerts and notifications. Additionally, while Google Cloud Identity excels at managing access to Google Cloud resources, it may not be the best fit for organizations heavily reliant on third-party cloud services or on-premises applications due to its lack of native support. In conclusion, Google Cloud Identity is best suited for businesses already invested in the Google Cloud ecosystem, especially those looking for a user-friendly platform with tight integration and robust security features. However, organizations with complex IT environments or a strong need for customization might need to look elsewhere.
Is ManageEngine ADManager Plus a plus for managing identities and access, or does it belong in the *engine* room, far from critical IAM tasks? User reviews from the last year reveal a product that excels in certain areas while needing improvement in others. Users consistently praise ADManager Plus for its user-friendly interface and robust bulk user management capabilities, highlighting its ability to streamline tasks like user creation and modification, saving significant time compared to manual methods. The automation features, particularly for provisioning and deprovisioning, are also well-received, ensuring a smoother workflow and reducing the risk of errors. However, the software isn't without its drawbacks. A recurring theme in user feedback points to limitations in reporting customization and complex filtering. While the reporting feature itself is generally viewed positively, the lack of flexibility in tailoring reports to specific needs is a notable concern. For instance, some users have expressed frustration with the inability to fine-tune reports to filter data based on specific criteria or customize the layout and presentation of the information. This limitation can hinder the ability to extract truly meaningful insights from the data. Despite these shortcomings, ADManager Plus is generally considered a valuable tool for organizations seeking to simplify their Active Directory management. Its strengths lie in its ease of use, bulk operation efficiency, and automation capabilities, making it particularly well-suited for organizations with high user turnover or those looking to streamline their IAM processes. However, organizations that require highly granular and customizable reporting may find the software's limitations in this area to be a significant drawback.
Is Entra ID the real deal when it comes to managing identities and access, or does it leave users feeling locked out? User reviews from the past year paint a generally positive picture of Entra ID, particularly highlighting its robust security features and seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem. Users consistently praise its multi-factor authentication and single sign-on capabilities, finding them to be both secure and user-friendly. The tight integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure is also a major selling point for many, as it simplifies user management and enhances productivity. However, some users find the initial setup and configuration to be somewhat complex, especially for those unfamiliar with identity management concepts. Additionally, while Entra ID covers the essentials well, it lacks some of the advanced customization options and user self-service features found in competitors like Okta and SailPoint. For instance, the absence of a dedicated self-service portal can place a greater burden on IT administrators for routine tasks like password resets. Overall, Entra ID emerges as a strong contender in the identity and access management space, particularly well-suited for organizations deeply entrenched in the Microsoft ecosystem. Its robust security features, seamless Microsoft integration, and centralized management capabilities make it a compelling choice for businesses seeking a comprehensive yet user-friendly IAM solution. However, those requiring highly granular customization or advanced self-service features might find other solutions more suitable.
Top Alternatives in IAM Software
AD360
AWS IAM
Cloud Identity
Customer Identity Cloud
CyberArk Workforce Identity
Entra ID
Entra ID Governance
Entrust Identity Enterprise
IBM Security Verify
JumpCloud
OneLogin
Oracle Identity and Access Management
Passly
Ping Identity
RSA ID Plus
SafeNet Trusted Access
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Workforce Identity Cloud
We’re the employee-owned Austin-based startup democratizing software data so you can make your decisions in an influence-free zone. Our market data is crowdsourced from our user-base of 100,000+ companies.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...