Entra ID vs ADManager Plus

Is Entra ID the real deal when it comes to managing identities and access, or does it leave users feeling locked out? User reviews from the past year paint a generally positive picture of Entra ID, particularly highlighting its robust security features and seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem. Users consistently praise its multi-factor authentication and single sign-on capabilities, finding them to be both secure and user-friendly. The tight integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure is also a major selling point for many, as it simplifies user management and enhances productivity. However, some users find the initial setup and configuration to be somewhat complex, especially for those unfamiliar with identity management concepts. Additionally, while Entra ID covers the essentials well, it lacks some of the advanced customization options and user self-service features found in competitors like Okta and SailPoint. For instance, the absence of a dedicated self-service portal can place a greater burden on IT administrators for routine tasks like password resets. Overall, Entra ID emerges as a strong contender in the identity and access management space, particularly well-suited for organizations deeply entrenched in the Microsoft ecosystem. Its robust security features, seamless Microsoft integration, and centralized management capabilities make it a compelling choice for businesses seeking a comprehensive yet user-friendly IAM solution. However, those requiring highly granular customization or advanced self-service features might find other solutions more suitable.

Is ManageEngine ADManager Plus a plus for managing identities and access, or does it belong in the *engine* room, far from critical IAM tasks? User reviews from the last year reveal a product that excels in certain areas while needing improvement in others. Users consistently praise ADManager Plus for its user-friendly interface and robust bulk user management capabilities, highlighting its ability to streamline tasks like user creation and modification, saving significant time compared to manual methods. The automation features, particularly for provisioning and deprovisioning, are also well-received, ensuring a smoother workflow and reducing the risk of errors. However, the software isn't without its drawbacks. A recurring theme in user feedback points to limitations in reporting customization and complex filtering. While the reporting feature itself is generally viewed positively, the lack of flexibility in tailoring reports to specific needs is a notable concern. For instance, some users have expressed frustration with the inability to fine-tune reports to filter data based on specific criteria or customize the layout and presentation of the information. This limitation can hinder the ability to extract truly meaningful insights from the data. Despite these shortcomings, ADManager Plus is generally considered a valuable tool for organizations seeking to simplify their Active Directory management. Its strengths lie in its ease of use, bulk operation efficiency, and automation capabilities, making it particularly well-suited for organizations with high user turnover or those looking to streamline their IAM processes. However, organizations that require highly granular and customizable reporting may find the software's limitations in this area to be a significant drawback.