Idaptive vs ADManager Plus

How "Idaptive" is CyberArk's solution for identity access management, but is it adaptable enough to earn positive user reviews? CyberArk Idaptive users praise the software for its robust security features, which leverage big data and machine learning to protect against unauthorized access. For example, one user specifically lauded Idaptive's ability to provide top-notch security for both regular users and accounts with elevated privileges, effectively guarding against malware and unauthorized access attempts. Users also appreciate the software's single sign-on (SSO) capabilities, which streamline access to multiple applications with a single set of credentials. This feature is particularly valuable for businesses with a large number of applications, as it simplifies the user experience and reduces the risk of password fatigue. However, the software's user interface has been criticized as being less intuitive than those offered by competitors like Okta and Microsoft Azure Active Directory. Some users have also reported that the pricing structure for Idaptive can be difficult to understand, especially when adding additional features or users. While these drawbacks are notable, they do not overshadow the software's strengths in security and SSO. Overall, CyberArk Idaptive is a good choice for enterprises that prioritize security and need a scalable IAM solution that can handle both cloud and on-premises applications. Its robust security features and SSO capabilities make it a valuable tool for businesses looking to protect sensitive data and streamline user access. However, organizations that place a high value on user experience and transparent pricing may want to consider alternative solutions.

Is ManageEngine ADManager Plus a plus for managing identities and access, or does it belong in the *engine* room, far from critical IAM tasks? User reviews from the last year reveal a product that excels in certain areas while needing improvement in others. Users consistently praise ADManager Plus for its user-friendly interface and robust bulk user management capabilities, highlighting its ability to streamline tasks like user creation and modification, saving significant time compared to manual methods. The automation features, particularly for provisioning and deprovisioning, are also well-received, ensuring a smoother workflow and reducing the risk of errors. However, the software isn't without its drawbacks. A recurring theme in user feedback points to limitations in reporting customization and complex filtering. While the reporting feature itself is generally viewed positively, the lack of flexibility in tailoring reports to specific needs is a notable concern. For instance, some users have expressed frustration with the inability to fine-tune reports to filter data based on specific criteria or customize the layout and presentation of the information. This limitation can hinder the ability to extract truly meaningful insights from the data. Despite these shortcomings, ADManager Plus is generally considered a valuable tool for organizations seeking to simplify their Active Directory management. Its strengths lie in its ease of use, bulk operation efficiency, and automation capabilities, making it particularly well-suited for organizations with high user turnover or those looking to streamline their IAM processes. However, organizations that require highly granular and customizable reporting may find the software's limitations in this area to be a significant drawback.