SecureAuth vs Fischer Identity
Last Updated:Our analysts compared SecureAuth vs Fischer Identity based on data from our 400+ point analysis of IAM Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Product Basics
Product Assistance
Product Insights
Product Ranking
User Sentiment Summary
Awards
SecureAuth stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Synopsis of User Ratings and Reviews
Is SecureAuth truly secure, or does it leave users feeling like they're locked out in the cold?User reviews from the past year for SecureAuth Identity Platform are largely positive, with many praising its robust security features and user-friendly interface. Users particularly appreciate the platform's adaptive authentication, which uses AI to assess risk and tailor security measures accordingly. This means users get strong security without being bombarded with unnecessary authentication challenges. One user specifically highlighted the "great user experience" and "comfortable and flexible" interface, while another praised the platform's ability to "strengthen security without user disruption." However, some users have reported that SecureAuth, while solid and reliable, can sometimes feel like it's lagging behind competitors like Okta in terms of innovation. One user wished for "more new innovation," noting that other products have "caught up and in some cases surpassed" SecureAuth in terms of features. Overall, SecureAuth Identity Platform appears to be a good choice for organizations looking for a reliable and user-friendly IAM solution. Its strengths lie in its adaptive authentication, ease of use, and strong security features. However, organizations looking for cutting-edge features and functionality may want to compare SecureAuth with some of its competitors before making a decision.
Users consistently highlight Fischer Identity's adaptability as a key strength, praising its availability as both on-premise and cloud-based solutions. This flexibility caters to a variety of organizational structures and needs, making it a practical choice for businesses at different stages of digital transformation. For instance, Coppin State University successfully implemented Fischer Identity's on-premise solution in 2006, demonstrating the platform's early adoption of diverse deployment models. Users also commend Fischer Identity's robust integration capabilities with popular systems like SAP, AWS, and Microsoft Entra. This seamless integration allows for streamlined automated provisioning, efficient role management, and the implementation of robust multi-factor authentication, enhancing overall security posture. However, one recurring suggestion for improvement is the development of a mobile application. A mobile version would be a welcome addition for users who are constantly on the move, allowing them to manage identities and access permissions from any location. Overall, Fischer Identity emerges as a comprehensive and user-friendly IAM solution that excels in its flexibility, integration capabilities, and commitment to compliance. Its intuitive interface and robust support make it particularly well-suited for organizations looking to strengthen their security posture, streamline IAM processes, and reduce the burden on IT teams, regardless of their size or technical expertise.
Screenshots
Top Alternatives in IAM Software
AD360
AWS IAM
Cisco Duo
Cloud Identity
Customer Identity Cloud
CyberArk Workforce Identity
Entra ID
Entra ID Governance
Entrust Identity Enterprise
IBM Security Verify
JumpCloud
OneLogin
Oracle Identity and Access Management
Passly
Ping Identity
RSA ID Plus
SafeNet Trusted Access
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Workforce Identity Cloud
FAQ
We’re the employee-owned Austin-based startup democratizing software data so you can make your decisions in an influence-free zone. Our market data is crowdsourced from our user-base of 100,000+ companies.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...