Lansweeper vs Device42

Is Lansweeper the new sweeper in town for IT asset management, or does it need to clean up its act? User reviews from the past year paint a generally positive picture of Lansweeper, highlighting its strengths in device discovery, asset detailing, and affordability. Users particularly appreciate its ease of deployment and use, especially for software audits and report generation. For instance, one user mentioned Lansweeper's ability to track CPU, memory, and network usage on workstations at intervals, allowing them to assess user experience and validate claims about resource consumption. This granular monitoring capability was noted as a valuable feature not commonly found in other tools. However, some criticisms do surface. The reporting engine, while powerful, is considered complex and may require SQL knowledge for customization. Concerns about data sovereignty are also raised with the cloud instance, despite its superior data analysis capabilities. A few users also point out that the user interface could benefit from improvements for enhanced usability. One user specifically mentioned that while Lansweeper is simple to set up and use, its deployment tools are weak, with limited installer logic and no access to WMI for creating conditions. This suggests that while the core functionality is strong, certain aspects could be refined for a smoother user experience. Overall, Lansweeper emerges as a robust and cost-effective IT asset management solution best suited for organizations of all sizes seeking comprehensive device visibility and control. Its strengths lie in its ease of use, detailed asset information, and powerful scanning capabilities, making it particularly valuable for tasks like software audits and compliance reporting. However, organizations requiring advanced reporting customization or those with strict data sovereignty requirements might need to consider these factors.

Is Device42 the "device" for you? User reviews from the past year suggest that Device42 is a robust IT asset management solution that excels in several key areas. Users consistently praise its intuitive interface and agentless discovery, which simplifies the often-daunting task of gaining visibility into complex IT environments. The software's dependency mapping capabilities are also highly regarded, allowing organizations to understand the intricate relationships between their IT assets and streamline change management processes. For instance, one user highlighted how Device42's dependency chart significantly benefited their change manager. Another user emphasized the platform's comprehensive nature, allowing them to start with one area, populate it, and then seamlessly move on to the next until everything is interconnected. This modular approach makes Device42 adaptable to various organizational needs and workflows. However, some users point out areas where Device42 could improve. While the support is generally considered responsive and helpful, some suggest that enhancing the knowledge base would empower users with more self-service options. Additionally, there are calls for modernizing the user interface and dashboard to align with contemporary design standards. Despite these areas for improvement, Device42 is lauded for its strong API functionality, robust IPAM capabilities, and detailed data export options, which allow for seamless integration with other tools and workflows. One user specifically appreciated the ability to populate data within Device42, export it to Excel for quick modifications, and then import it back into the system, demonstrating the platform's flexibility. Device42 is particularly well-suited for IT departments in large enterprises seeking a comprehensive solution to improve asset visibility, optimize workflows, and ensure compliance. Its ease of use, agentless discovery, and dependency mapping capabilities make it a valuable tool for organizations looking to gain control over their IT infrastructure. However, organizations prioritizing modern UI design and extensive self-service options might need to weigh these factors against Device42's strengths in other areas.