Juris vs Firm Central

Is Juris a jurisprudent choice for managing your firm's finances? Based on user reviews from the past year, Juris receives mixed feedback for its performance as a financial management software. Users praise its user-friendly interface for timekeeping, highlighting its ease of use for entering time contemporaneously with tasks, which enhances efficiency. The software's robust reporting and analysis capabilities, along with its secure database that prevents unauthorized alterations, are also commended. However, Juris faces criticism for its outdated appearance and basic reporting functionalities, limiting users' ability to perform in-depth data analysis. The lack of custom report creation further restricts users' flexibility in tailoring reports to their specific needs. Some users experience glitches when the software is left open for extended periods and express dissatisfaction with the inability to run multiple timers simultaneously. While Juris excels in timekeeping and billing, its limitations in reporting and data analysis make it more suitable for smaller firms or those with less complex financial management requirements. Larger firms or those requiring advanced reporting and analytical capabilities might find alternative solutions more fitting.

Firm Central provides legal practitioners with a capable practice management solution with direct access to Westlaw. It offers secure and fast web access to basic features, including time tracking, billing, accounting, and matter and task management modules. Access to Westlaw is an important asset and should weigh heavily on any acquisition decision. That said, multiple integrations can drive up costs and put a lot of pressure on the platform. Implementation and technical support can be hard to reach at times. Unless a Westlaw integration is absolutely essential to the firm, there are better options available in this price range.