Udemy vs WebAssign

Udemy is an online learning solution that provides instructor-led learning classes. Users can pick from a varied selection of topics and train at their own pace. Most reviewers were especially pleased with the features, especially the ability to control the speed of learning. Reviewers left overwhelmingly positive comments on the quality of the classes. Many learners said they were still able to contact their instructors when needed. Most users felt their teachers were skilled and knew their subjects well. Users praised its skill-building both in personal and corporate environments. Though users did like the classes, they also recommended heavily screening for quality. Some complained that the platform didn’t vet what was on the site well. Udemy has reviews for all of its classes left by users. Most people recommended weeding out the good ones from the bad ones. The most significant criticism by far came from people trying to get refunds. They said they had trouble contacting customer support or didn’t receive their money back. Others disliked the 30-day refund policy and felt cheated by it. Users were split on the price of the courses. Classes often came with discounts and some felt they were reasonably priced. Others felt they were too expensive or got angry when they paid for a class that was later offered for free. Udemy is a helpful resource for self-paced learners who have a specific set of skills they want. Vet the courses carefully, wait for discounts and look for details if the price isn’t satisfactory. It doesn’t have HR functionality as it’s more of a content library than a full LMS. Larger organizations who want to take an analytics-driven approach to learning should look elsewhere.

Let's *assign* ourselves the task of dissecting WebAssign's user feedback. WebAssign garners mixed reviews, with a recurring theme of it being a powerful tool when it works as intended, but frustrating when technical issues arise. Users appreciate the extensive library of pre-built questions and assignments, saving instructors valuable time. The automatic grading feature is a major plus, especially for large classes, but several users report grading inconsistencies and errors that require manual intervention. WebAssign's integration with learning management systems (LMS) like Blackboard and Canvas is a significant advantage, streamlining workflow for educators. However, the user interface is often criticized for being clunky and outdated, leading to a steep learning curve for both instructors and students. Some users find the platform's customization options limiting, hindering their ability to tailor assignments to specific needs. Cost is another concern, with some institutions finding it to be a pricey option compared to competitors like Pearson's MyLab or WileyPLUS. WebAssign seems best suited for large STEM courses where automatic grading and a vast question bank are priorities, but instructors should be prepared to invest time in learning the platform and troubleshooting potential technical glitches. For smaller courses or those in non-STEM fields, the cost and complexity might outweigh the benefits, making alternative platforms worth exploring.