WebAssign vs Edvance360

Let's *assign* ourselves the task of dissecting WebAssign's user feedback. WebAssign garners mixed reviews, with a recurring theme of it being a powerful tool when it works as intended, but frustrating when technical issues arise. Users appreciate the extensive library of pre-built questions and assignments, saving instructors valuable time. The automatic grading feature is a major plus, especially for large classes, but several users report grading inconsistencies and errors that require manual intervention. WebAssign's integration with learning management systems (LMS) like Blackboard and Canvas is a significant advantage, streamlining workflow for educators. However, the user interface is often criticized for being clunky and outdated, leading to a steep learning curve for both instructors and students. Some users find the platform's customization options limiting, hindering their ability to tailor assignments to specific needs. Cost is another concern, with some institutions finding it to be a pricey option compared to competitors like Pearson's MyLab or WileyPLUS. WebAssign seems best suited for large STEM courses where automatic grading and a vast question bank are priorities, but instructors should be prepared to invest time in learning the platform and troubleshooting potential technical glitches. For smaller courses or those in non-STEM fields, the cost and complexity might outweigh the benefits, making alternative platforms worth exploring.

Edvance360 is an eLearning and training solution for educational and corporate use. Overall, reviewers felt it was easy to use and a solution they’d recommend to others. In particular, they called out features such as assignment management, permissions control, customization options, course control and the system of alerts. Administratively, it provided an appropriate level of control while still being useful on an individual level. Commenters also felt the customer service was extremely helpful, though a few noted they were slow to respond occasionally. The biggest problem by far was the learning process. Reviewers said it was a steep and difficult learning curve. They disliked the emailing system, saying it was sometimes glitchy and hard to use. Users also felt that the reporting was too limited and the process of pulling reports was too complicated. Overall, this may be a good choice for small to medium companies or educational institutions with some technical know-how on the back end who are looking to create and deploy courses.