WebAssign vs GoSkills

Let's *assign* ourselves the task of dissecting WebAssign's user feedback. WebAssign garners mixed reviews, with a recurring theme of it being a powerful tool when it works as intended, but frustrating when technical issues arise. Users appreciate the extensive library of pre-built questions and assignments, saving instructors valuable time. The automatic grading feature is a major plus, especially for large classes, but several users report grading inconsistencies and errors that require manual intervention. WebAssign's integration with learning management systems (LMS) like Blackboard and Canvas is a significant advantage, streamlining workflow for educators. However, the user interface is often criticized for being clunky and outdated, leading to a steep learning curve for both instructors and students. Some users find the platform's customization options limiting, hindering their ability to tailor assignments to specific needs. Cost is another concern, with some institutions finding it to be a pricey option compared to competitors like Pearson's MyLab or WileyPLUS. WebAssign seems best suited for large STEM courses where automatic grading and a vast question bank are priorities, but instructors should be prepared to invest time in learning the platform and troubleshooting potential technical glitches. For smaller courses or those in non-STEM fields, the cost and complexity might outweigh the benefits, making alternative platforms worth exploring.

GoSkills provides training and professional development to employees. Most reviewers loved the class themselves. They described them as being available in “bite-sized chunks,” perfect for learning amid a busy day. Most liked the courses, customer service and price. Commenters were happy with the functionality, including tools for professional development, knowledge acquisition, and a way to learn-on-the go. Lastly, they felt the quizzes were effective and reinforced their learning. While users generally loved the videos and presentations, they also said the pace was too slow. Some manually adjusted the speed. Reviewers who wanted more detailed information or advanced training from a class were disappointed to find that the courses were more surface-level and beginner-oriented. Others had difficulty accessing the courses after completion or were unable to do so. Overall, this is an excellent training tool for small to medium businesses looking to increase compliance and foster a community of continuous learning.