Top FileMaker Alternatives & Competitors For 2024
Last Updated:Looking for alternatives to FileMaker? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Application Development and Deployment, Collaboration and Sharing, and Data Management. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real Low-Code Development Platforms selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of FileMaker to leading industry alternatives like Kissflow, GeneXus, OutSystems, and Superblocks.
Product Basics
Request for Free
Request for Free
Request for Free
Request for Free
Request for Free
Product Assistance
Product Ranking
#13
among all
Low-Code Development Platforms
#15
among all
Low-Code Development Platforms
#20
among all
Low-Code Development Platforms
#8
among all
Low-Code Development Platforms
#19
among all
Low-Code Development Platforms
Analyst Rating Summary
Analyst Ratings for Functional Requirements Customize This Data Customize This Data
Analyst Ratings for Technical Requirements Customize This Data Customize This Data
User Sentiment Summary
FileMaker has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 86% when considering 181 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
Awards
Synopsis of User Ratings and Reviews
Can FileMaker really make application development a walk in the park, or is it more like navigating a thorny thicket? User reviews from the past year suggest that while FileMaker offers a compelling blend of power and user-friendliness, it's not without its drawbacks. Many users, particularly those new to coding, praise FileMaker for its intuitive interface and drag-and-drop functionality, enabling them to build functional applications with relative ease. This ease of use, however, doesn't necessarily translate to building complex applications with advanced features, which often demands a steeper learning curve and more specialized knowledge. FileMaker shines in its ability to integrate seamlessly with other services like Zapier and popular databases, a feature often highlighted as a key differentiator compared to competitors with more limited integration options. This versatility makes it a popular choice for businesses looking to streamline workflows and connect disparate systems. However, a recurring concern among users revolves around cost, particularly for larger teams or organizations. While FileMaker might be a more affordable option compared to enterprise-grade platforms like Salesforce or Microsoft Power Apps, the pricing structure, which is often subscription-based, can become a significant expense as usage scales. Furthermore, some users report performance issues when working with large datasets or complex applications, which can hinder productivity and lead to frustration. Overall, FileMaker seems best suited for small to medium-sized businesses or departments within larger organizations seeking to build custom applications with moderate complexity. Its intuitive interface makes it approachable for non-coders, while its powerful features and integration capabilities provide the flexibility to handle a wide range of business needs. However, organizations with more complex requirements or large datasets might need to carefully evaluate the platform's limitations and consider whether a more robust, albeit potentially more expensive, solution might be a better fit.
Can Kissflow help your business operations flow smoothly like a well-choreographed dance? User reviews from the past year suggest that for many, the answer is a resounding yes. Kissflow consistently earns praise for its user-friendly interface, which empowers even non-technical users to build custom applications and automate workflows with ease. This accessibility is a key differentiator, as it reduces reliance on IT departments and empowers business users to directly address their needs. However, this ease of use comes with a caveat: some users find the learning curve steep, particularly when exploring the platform's extensive customization options. While Kissflow excels at simplifying app development, mastering its full potential may require a significant time investment. Furthermore, while the platform generally receives high marks for its functionality, some users express room for improvement in customer support. Despite these challenges, Kissflow's strengths in user-friendliness, customization, and integration make it a compelling choice for businesses seeking to streamline operations and embrace digital transformation. Its ability to empower citizen developers and automate tasks makes it particularly well-suited for organizations looking to improve efficiency and reduce their dependence on traditional IT development cycles.
Is GeneXus truly a software development genius, or does it fall short? User reviews from the last year reveal a mixed bag. While GeneXus shines in its ease of use and ability to expedite application development, some areas need improvement. Many users praise GeneXus for its intuitive interface, enabling even those with limited coding experience to build applications quickly. Its robust integration capabilities and support for multi-platform deployments further enhance its appeal, particularly for large-scale projects. For instance, one user lauded GeneXus's ability to generate applications for both web and mobile platforms from a single codebase, significantly boosting productivity. However, some users expressed concerns about the adequacy of documentation, finding it difficult to troubleshoot specific issues. The platform's stronger focus on backend development was also highlighted, with suggestions for improvement in front-end capabilities. While the smaller community compared to other platforms might limit readily available resources, GeneXus's strengths lie in its ability to streamline complex development processes and future-proof applications. This makes it an excellent choice for medium to large enterprises seeking a comprehensive low-code solution, particularly those prioritizing rapid development and broad integration capabilities.
Is OutSystems the outstanding solution for your low-code development needs? OutSystems receives largely positive reviews from users, particularly for its ability to accelerate application development. Users consistently highlight the platform's intuitive visual interface, which allows both novice and experienced developers to build complex applications with minimal coding. This ease of use, however, can sometimes be a double-edged sword, as it can lead to developer dependency on the platform, potentially making it difficult to transition to other systems or companies in the future. One of OutSystems' standout features is its robust application lifecycle management, including its continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) capabilities. This, coupled with its strong integration capabilities with various systems and APIs, makes it a favorite for organizations looking to streamline their development processes and connect disparate systems. However, some users express concerns about the platform's ability to keep pace with the rapidly evolving world of technology. Overall, OutSystems is a powerful low-code platform best suited for organizations that prioritize speed and efficiency in application development, particularly those focused on automating processes and creating intuitive data dashboards. Its user-friendly interface and comprehensive features make it an attractive option for businesses looking to build robust web and mobile applications quickly, but potential users should be aware of the potential drawbacks, such as vendor lock-in and the need for continuous updates.
Is Superblocks really super, or will it block you from achieving your goals? User reviews from the past year paint a largely positive picture of this low-code platform, particularly praising its user-friendly design that simplifies application development. Many users, especially those without extensive coding experience, find the platform intuitive and easy to navigate, which allows them to build and launch applications much faster than traditional methods. This ease of use, coupled with robust integration capabilities, makes Superblocks a versatile tool for various use cases, from automating internal workflows to creating custom applications. Users highlight the platform's ability to seamlessly integrate with a wide range of third-party tools, streamlining data management and enhancing overall efficiency. However, no platform is without its drawbacks. Some users have reported that the on-premise deployment process can be cumbersome, especially for those not operating entirely within the AWS ecosystem. A few users also expressed a desire for improved graph support for more robust data visualization options. While the platform's scheduling interface is generally considered user-friendly, some suggest adding features like bounds checking for time for increased control and flexibility. Overall, Superblocks excels in its primary function: empowering users to build and deploy applications quickly and efficiently. Its intuitive interface, extensive integration capabilities, and responsive customer support make it a valuable asset for businesses looking to streamline operations and accelerate digital transformation initiatives. While there's room for improvement in areas like on-premise deployment and graph support, Superblocks' strengths lie in its ability to democratize application development, making it particularly well-suited for organizations with limited coding experience or those seeking to rapidly prototype and deploy custom solutions.
Related Categories
Top Alternatives in Low-Code Development Platforms
Appian
Astro Zero
Creatio Studio
GeneXus
HCL Volt MX
Kintone
Mendix
NewgenONE
Oracle APEX
OutSystems
Pega Infinity
Power Apps
Retool
Salesforce
ServiceNow App Engine
Unqork
Zoho Creator
We’re the employee-owned Austin-based startup democratizing software data so you can make your decisions in an influence-free zone. Our market data is crowdsourced from our user-base of 100,000+ companies.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...