Our analysts compared E2 Shop System vs QAD ERP based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Manufacturing Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
E2 Shop System is a solution that manages job shops and made-to-order, mixed-mode and job-based manufacturing. It is available in a cloud-based or on-premise deployment model and gives users the flexibility to handle job schedules and change customer due dates. Users can control their data, clock out and on jobs, and update their inventory from their mobile apps.
It is suitable for assembly, fabrication, foam, mold, captive shops and more. It gives users real-time tracking insights into the manufacturing shop floor. It supports job tracking and costing and handles the complexities of printed circuit boards to keep production expenses low.
among all Manufacturing Software
E2 Shop System has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 86% when considering 655 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
QAD ERP has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 74% when considering 54 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
E2 Shop System is a job shop manufacturing program that streamlines production with a seamlessly easy interface and rapid implementation process. Its overall performance is satisfactory, although it experiences the occasional glitches. Its vast amount of features —such as inventory management, quality management, accounting and invoicing amongst others —is helpful in expediting tasks. However, some users found that the reporting, searching and scheduling modules have limitations. The customer support team is knowledgeable and quick to resolve issues. Overall, most users find E2 Shop System a helpful and sophisticated software.
User reviews of QAD ERP reveal a love-hate relationship. Fans tout its industry-specific muscle and enhanced control, with one user gushing, "It's like SAP on steroids for automakers; we finally have real-time visibility into production flows." However, its complexity can be daunting. "Compared to Acumatica," admits another, "QAD has a steeper learning curve, but its customization blows it out of the water, especially for our intricate assembly lines." The customization aspect is a double-edged sword. "Implementing QAD was an Everest-sized task," laments one reviewer, "and ongoing tweaks can be pricey compared to something like NetSuite." In the end, user experiences suggest QAD shines for manufacturers craving a highly configurable and industry-specific platform, but be prepared to invest sweat and tears (and dollars) in implementation and training.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...