IQS vs QAD ERP

IQS received generally positive feedback from users in the past year. Users found its interface intuitive and easy to navigate, making it simple to learn and use. They also appreciated the software's flexibility, which allowed them to customize it to fit their specific needs. Some users noted that IQS could be slow at times, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Others mentioned that the reporting features could be more robust. What sets IQS apart is its comprehensive quality management capabilities. It covers everything from document control and training management to non-conformance tracking and corrective action. This makes it a one-stop shop for all things quality-related, which can be a major advantage for businesses looking to streamline their operations. The software's focus on compliance is another key differentiator. IQS helps businesses meet the requirements of various industry standards, such as ISO 9001 and FDA 21 CFR Part 11. This can save businesses time and money by avoiding costly compliance issues. IQS is best suited for small to mid-sized manufacturing businesses that need a comprehensive and user-friendly quality management system. Its flexibility and compliance focus make it a valuable tool for businesses in a variety of industries, including automotive, aerospace, medical device, and food and beverage. However, businesses with large amounts of data or complex reporting needs may want to consider other options.

User reviews of QAD ERP reveal a love-hate relationship. Fans tout its industry-specific muscle and enhanced control, with one user gushing, "It's like SAP on steroids for automakers; we finally have real-time visibility into production flows." However, its complexity can be daunting. "Compared to Acumatica," admits another, "QAD has a steeper learning curve, but its customization blows it out of the water, especially for our intricate assembly lines." The customization aspect is a double-edged sword. "Implementing QAD was an Everest-sized task," laments one reviewer, "and ongoing tweaks can be pricey compared to something like NetSuite." In the end, user experiences suggest QAD shines for manufacturers craving a highly configurable and industry-specific platform, but be prepared to invest sweat and tears (and dollars) in implementation and training.