Our analysts compared Kenandy vs QAD ERP based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Manufacturing Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all Manufacturing Software
Kenandy has a 'fair' User Satisfaction Rating of 67% when considering 6 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
QAD ERP has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 74% when considering 54 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Is Kenandy ERP the “kandy” shop for manufacturers looking to streamline their operations? Kenandy, a cloud-based ERP solution, has garnered a generally favorable reputation among users for its adaptability, integration prowess, and user-friendly design. A particularly compelling aspect is its seamless integration with Salesforce, a feature highly valued by users who appreciate the convenience of a unified platform. This integration facilitates streamlined data flow and enhanced collaboration between sales and operations teams. Moreover, Kenandy empowers businesses to tailor workflows to their specific requirements, a characteristic praised by users from diverse industries. However, some users have pointed out that the initial setup can be intricate and may necessitate a substantial commitment of time and resources. This complexity might pose challenges for smaller businesses with limited IT support. Occasionally, users have also mentioned performance hiccups and a desire for more robust customer support. Despite these drawbacks, Kenandy's strengths in flexibility, Salesforce integration, and user-friendliness make it a suitable choice for businesses already invested in the Salesforce ecosystem, particularly those seeking to enhance operational efficiency and streamline processes.
User reviews of QAD ERP reveal a love-hate relationship. Fans tout its industry-specific muscle and enhanced control, with one user gushing, "It's like SAP on steroids for automakers; we finally have real-time visibility into production flows." However, its complexity can be daunting. "Compared to Acumatica," admits another, "QAD has a steeper learning curve, but its customization blows it out of the water, especially for our intricate assembly lines." The customization aspect is a double-edged sword. "Implementing QAD was an Everest-sized task," laments one reviewer, "and ongoing tweaks can be pricey compared to something like NetSuite." In the end, user experiences suggest QAD shines for manufacturers craving a highly configurable and industry-specific platform, but be prepared to invest sweat and tears (and dollars) in implementation and training.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...