Our analysts compared ProShop vs QAD ERP based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Manufacturing Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all Manufacturing Software
ProShop has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 99% when considering 65 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
QAD ERP has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 74% when considering 54 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
ProShop stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Over the past year, reviews highlight ProShop's robust scheduling capabilities as a standout feature, enabling efficient management of complex manufacturing processes and optimization of production schedules to minimize downtime and maximize output. Users also appreciate the software's comprehensive inventory management tools, which provide real-time visibility into stock levels, automate reordering processes, and prevent stockouts and overstocking. ProShop's quality control functionalities are also praised, allowing manufacturers to track and manage quality issues, ensuring products meet the required standards. However, some users note that ProShop's interface can have a steep learning curve, particularly for those unfamiliar with manufacturing software. Additionally, while ProShop offers a wide range of features, some users find that certain advanced functionalities may require additional configuration or customization to fully meet their specific needs. Despite these drawbacks, ProShop is generally considered a valuable tool for small to medium-sized manufacturers seeking to streamline their operations and improve efficiency. Its comprehensive features, particularly in scheduling, inventory management, and quality control, make it well-suited for businesses looking for an all-in-one solution to manage their manufacturing processes.
User reviews of QAD ERP reveal a love-hate relationship. Fans tout its industry-specific muscle and enhanced control, with one user gushing, "It's like SAP on steroids for automakers; we finally have real-time visibility into production flows." However, its complexity can be daunting. "Compared to Acumatica," admits another, "QAD has a steeper learning curve, but its customization blows it out of the water, especially for our intricate assembly lines." The customization aspect is a double-edged sword. "Implementing QAD was an Everest-sized task," laments one reviewer, "and ongoing tweaks can be pricey compared to something like NetSuite." In the end, user experiences suggest QAD shines for manufacturers craving a highly configurable and industry-specific platform, but be prepared to invest sweat and tears (and dollars) in implementation and training.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...