Our analysts compared athenahealth vs Cerner Practice Management based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Medical Practice Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Medical Practice Management Software
athenahealth has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 75% when considering 953 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Cerner Practice Management has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 71% when considering 252 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
User reviews paint a compelling picture of athenaOne's strengths and weaknesses. Many users laud its intuitiveness and efficiency, comparing it favorably to Epic in particular. "Charting a patient in athenaOne takes half the time compared to Epic," one user shared, highlighting the streamlined interface. Another user raved about the integrated functionalities, stating, "The way athenaOne links billing and scheduling saves us so much time compared to our previous system, which kept everything siloed." However, some users expressed frustrations with limited customization options and occasional hiccups in customer support. "I wish athenaOne offered more granular control over customizing templates and workflows like you can in Epic," commented one user, seeking greater personalization. Another mentioned, "Customer support can be a mixed bag. While they're sometimes helpful and prompt, I've also had experiences with long wait times and inconsistent responses." Overall, user reviews suggest athenaOne shines in user-friendliness, comprehensive features, and workflow efficiency, rivaling even industry giants like Epic in these aspects. While some limitations around customization and support exist, athenaOne remains a strong contender in the EHR market, offering a user-friendly and feature-rich experience for healthcare providers looking to optimize their practice operations.
Cerner Practice Management, a comprehensive software solution designed to streamline administrative tasks in healthcare settings, has elicited a range of user feedback. While some users appreciate the software's user-friendly interface and extensive features, others express concerns about its cost and potential rigidity. Let's delve into the specifics of these perspectives. Users frequently commend Cerner Practice Management for its intuitive design and ease of use. The software's interface is lauded for its straightforwardness, enabling healthcare professionals to navigate the system efficiently. Additionally, the software's customizability empowers practices to tailor the system to their specific workflows and requirements. This adaptability is particularly beneficial for practices with unique operational needs. However, the software's cost can be a significant barrier for smaller practices or those with limited budgets. The price tag associated with Cerner Practice Management may necessitate careful consideration and financial planning. Cerner Practice Management distinguishes itself through its robust integration capabilities. The software seamlessly integrates with Cerner's electronic health record (EHR) system, facilitating a smooth exchange of patient data and streamlining clinical workflows. This integration is especially advantageous for healthcare organizations already utilizing Cerner's EHR solutions. Furthermore, Cerner Practice Management offers both cloud-based and on-premise deployment options, providing flexibility to accommodate diverse technological preferences and infrastructure limitations. Considering these factors, Cerner Practice Management is well-suited for medium to large healthcare practices seeking a comprehensive, integrated solution to optimize their administrative processes and enhance operational efficiency. Smaller practices may find alternative solutions better aligned with their budgetary constraints.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...