Our analysts compared Workable vs SilkRoad Recruiting based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Recruitment Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
Workable is a recruitment software designed to streamline the hiring process for businesses of all sizes. It offers a user-friendly interface and a comprehensive set of features that cover the entire recruitment lifecycle, from posting job openings to onboarding new hires. Small and medium-sized businesses, as well as large enterprises, find value in Workable due to its scalability and flexibility.
Workable provides several benefits to its users, including improved efficiency in the hiring process, reduced time-to-hire, and better collaboration among hiring teams. Popular features include job posting to multiple platforms, applicant tracking, interview scheduling, and offer management. Compared to similar products, Workable is often praised for its ease of use, intuitive interface, and robust feature set. Pricing for Workable is based on the number of active jobs and the features included, with options for monthly or annual payments.
among all Recruitment Software
Workable has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 89% when considering 784 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
SilkRoad Recruiting has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 75% when considering 279 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Workable is a recruiting solution that provides a range of hiring tools. Users who commented on the platform said it was efficient and saved time and effort with its automated processes. Reviewers liked the UI and said it was easy to learn and adopt and had overwhelmingly positive experiences with the prompt and knowledgeable customer service. They felt the reporting worked well and delivered the necessary data to plan strategically. Above all, they were impressed with the recruiting functionality and especially liked the ATS, one-click job posting and talent acquisition and sourcing features. Hiring managers especially found it beneficial. In terms of issues and opportunities for growth, users consistently had problems attaching and grouping additional files with the candidate profile. They state it was difficult to centralize documents other than resumes such as certifications, samples, letters of recommendation and more. Some also felt that the overall customization and branding was somewhat limited. Last, workers reported difficulty getting everyone’s feed together in group settings on the platform. Workable may be a good fit for medium-sized organizations, especially those with hiring managers, who need to automate the recruiting process. Larger companies may find it too limiting. It may also be a good fit for small companies with the necessary budget; many found it quite affordable.
Although the solution addresses the basic needs for recruitment, some users complain it focuses more on the performance management and onboarding processes than the recruiting process. It has limited reporting and search capabilities compared to the other solutions in the market. Most users believe UI and UX should be more intuitive to facilitate ease of use.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...