Looking for alternatives to Enablon? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Risk Management, Reports and Dashboards, and Audit Management. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real Risk Management Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of Enablon to leading industry alternatives like Riskonnect, RSA Archer, SAI360, and Resolver.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Risk Management Software
Enablon has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 81% when considering 22 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Riskonnect has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 82% when considering 12 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
RSA Archer has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 80% when considering 143 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Resolver has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 88% when considering 15 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
How do users describe Enablon, and is it truly enabling businesses to effectively manage risk? User reviews from the last year reveal a mixed bag. Enablon shines in its comprehensive features, particularly for large enterprises grappling with compliance, incident management, and risk assessment. Users rave about its ability to streamline workflows, seamlessly transitioning from archaic paper-based systems to efficient electronic ones, and effortlessly integrating legacy applications. The intuitive and user-friendly interface garners praise, enhancing the overall user experience. For instance, one user lauded Enablon's intuitive design, highlighting its ease of use for setting reminders about expiring permits. This feature proves particularly valuable in heavily regulated industries where permit renewals are critical for maintaining operations. However, Enablon's reporting features have room for improvement, with users expressing a desire for more advanced functionalities. Despite this drawback, the platform's robustness, flexibility, and ability to handle complex risk management tasks effectively are highly commended. A case in point is Boeing's Transport Compliance team, which experienced a smoother workflow after integrating their legacy applications into Enablon. This seamless transition underscores Enablon's capacity to adapt to existing systems, a crucial factor for large organizations with established IT infrastructures. In conclusion, Enablon emerges as a solid choice for organizations, particularly large enterprises, seeking to bolster their risk management and compliance processes. Its strengths lie in its comprehensive features, user-friendly interface, and ability to streamline complex workflows. However, potential users should be mindful of its limitations in reporting capabilities. Overall, Enablon proves to be a valuable tool for organizations ready to level up their risk management game, even with areas for improvement.
Can Riskonnect help you reconnect with a sense of control over your organization's risk landscape? User reviews from the past year suggest that it can, particularly for those seeking a comprehensive and integrated approach to risk management. Users praise Riskonnect for its user-friendly interface and robust features, highlighting its ability to centralize risk data, streamline risk assessment processes, and facilitate informed decision-making. For example, the software's bow tie analysis feature allows users to visually map out the causes and consequences of potential risks, enabling proactive risk mitigation. This comprehensive approach sets Riskonnect apart from competitors that may focus on only specific aspects of risk management. However, some users have noted that the initial setup of Riskonnect can be complex and the software can be expensive. These drawbacks may make it less suitable for smaller organizations with limited budgets and technical expertise. Overall, Riskonnect appears to be best suited for larger organizations with complex risk profiles and the resources to implement and manage a sophisticated risk management solution. Its ability to integrate risk information across different departments and provide a holistic view of organizational risk makes it a valuable tool for enterprises seeking to enhance their risk management posture.
RSA Archer is frequently lauded for its comprehensive approach to risk management. It provides a centralized platform where organizations can identify, assess, and mitigate risks across various domains, including IT, finance, and operations. Users appreciate the ability to consolidate risk information from different sources, creating a holistic view of their risk landscape. This comprehensive approach is particularly valuable for organizations with complex risk profiles or those operating in highly regulated industries. Additionally, RSA Archer's scalability allows it to adapt to the needs of organizations of all sizes, making it a versatile solution for growing businesses. However, some users note that RSA Archer's extensive features can lead to a steeper learning curve compared to simpler risk management tools. Implementing and customizing the platform may require dedicated resources and expertise. While RSA Archer offers robust capabilities, its strength can also be its weakness for organizations seeking a more straightforward solution. Despite this, RSA Archer remains a top choice for organizations that prioritize a comprehensive and scalable risk management approach. Its ability to provide a centralized view of risk, automate workflows, and facilitate compliance makes it well-suited for businesses seeking to mature their risk management programs and navigate the complexities of today's ever-evolving risk landscape.
SAI360, a risk management software platform, has received positive feedback for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive features. Users appreciate the ability to quickly gain insights into their current risk landscape, which is particularly valuable for executive management. The platform's risk register is considered more efficient than traditional spreadsheets, allowing for the collection and evaluation of risk and control data, loss event data, and audit findings. Additionally, SAI360 facilitates GDPR management and security management, further enhancing its value proposition. However, some users have noted that the initial setup and configuration of SAI360 can be time-consuming. Integrating the platform with existing systems may also require additional effort. Despite these challenges, users generally agree that the benefits of using SAI360 outweigh the drawbacks. The platform's ability to streamline risk management processes, improve decision-making, and enhance overall risk visibility makes it a valuable tool for organizations of all sizes. SAI360 is particularly well-suited for organizations with complex risk management needs, as it offers a wide range of features and customization options. Its scalability and flexibility make it adaptable to various industries and organizational structures. Furthermore, SAI360's focus on continuous improvement and its responsiveness to user feedback ensures that the platform remains relevant and effective in addressing evolving risk management challenges.
Resolver provides enterprise risk management, incident management, and security and investigation modules in a stable and easy-to-use package. It offers a high degree of flexibility and customizability to ensure seamless scaling with changes and requirements. The ability to create custom reports further adds to its price to performance value. However, the platform’s lengthy implementation process can negatively impact time to market. All things considered, Resolver offers excellent functionalities for this price range as long as you don’t have to compromise on integration options important to your business.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...