Avature vs Oracle Talent Management

Avature is a talent management, recruiting and HR solution. Reviewers were most pleased with the recruiting tools saying it was easy to reach out to candidates, send automated emails, analyze the candidate pool and easily access past employment. They liked the dashboard and felt the system was easy to navigate with sophisticated search functionality. Most felt the support was adequate and the customer service was responsive, leading to easy setup and implementation. Many customized it to fit their specific workflows and found it useful. Other well-reviewed features included reporting and automation. One standard warning from reviewers was that Avature is a platform with robust features. They advised potential users to understand their priorities and requirements list inside and out before adopting the platform. Otherwise, this could lead to using a platform with more features than a smaller or less complicated business might need. Reviewers reported some issues with integrations and found the resume management somewhat unwieldy. Overall, Avature is an appropriate choice for medium and large enterprise ventures with complex recruiting needs. It’s beneficial for companies who screen large talent pools and want a broader HR suite.

Oracle is an overall talent management solution. Performance management was one of its most popular aspects. Users liked the overall management, professional development and skill set defining features. Its employee management, onboarding and talent management worked well aiding in optimizing the workforce. Recruiting was an especially well-liked tool with its ability to check candidate status, pull transcripts and engage in talent sourcing. Last, users were happy with its reporting elements as well. As for reviewer dissatisfaction, the most disliked aspect was the price. It’s a comprehensive and expensive product. This included a lack of adequate skill-based search, poor navigation, problems that arose from internet connections, and an overall feeling of it being too complicated. Many users also experience bugs, glitches and a slow data management process. The initial learning curve was said to be steep, it was hard to navigate, and users disliked the UI and lack of expansive documentation. Overall, this is a good tool for a medium-sized or enterprise company, especially one that’s looking for help recruiting talent and engaging in professional development. Though users should leave time for adapting to its somewhat complicated functionality. For smaller businesses or those with limited budgets, this is likely not the best solution.