Looking for alternatives to cegid? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Succession Planning, Learning Management, and Recruitment and Applicant Tracking. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real Talent Management Systems selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of cegid to leading industry alternatives like Talentsoft, Willis Towers Watson, Avature, and TalentGuard.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
Pros
Cons
among all Talent Management Systems
Talentsoft has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 125 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Willis Towers Watson has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 20 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Avature has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 88% when considering 125 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
TalentGuard has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 97% when considering 5 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Cegid's Talent Management System (TMS) has received mixed reviews over the past year. While some users praise its robust feature set and intuitive interface, others criticize its lack of customization options and limited reporting capabilities. However, many users believe that Cegid's TMS offers a strong value proposition compared to similar products due to its comprehensive functionality and ease of use. One of Cegid's key strengths is its ability to automate many HR processes, such as recruiting, onboarding, and performance management. This can save organizations significant time and money, and it can also help to improve employee engagement and retention. Additionally, Cegid's TMS is highly configurable, which allows organizations to tailor the system to their specific needs. This is a major advantage over competing products, which are often less flexible. However, Cegid's TMS is not without its weaknesses. Some users have complained about the system's lack of customization options, which can make it difficult to adapt the system to unique business requirements. Additionally, Cegid's reporting capabilities are somewhat limited, which can make it difficult to generate the insights needed to make informed decisions. Overall, Cegid's TMS is a solid choice for organizations looking for a comprehensive and easy-to-use talent management system. While the system does have some limitations, its strengths outweigh its weaknesses, and it offers a strong value proposition compared to similar products. Cegid's TMS is particularly well-suited for organizations that are looking to automate their HR processes and improve employee engagement and retention.
Talentsoft is an HR program that provides talent management, recruiting, training and more. Reviewers were pleased with their data’s integrity and safety, the time-saving elimination of manual processes, the multiple language functionality, and felt the features worked well. The customization element was by far the most popular, with many reviewers discussing how the company worked with them to meet their unique needs. However, some noted that the process was incredibly lengthy. Users were also happy with the robust recruiting capabilities and said they often used talent acquisition. Other commenters were less pleased with the platform overall, saying they wouldn’t recommend it to others. The feature with the most mixed reviews was online learning. Many felt it was severely lacking and not a strong point. Overall, Talentsoft is a good option for medium-sized businesses looking for recruiting, core HR, and light training needs.
Willis Tower Watson is a finance and risk management solution. Users with positive experiences especially enjoyed the anonymous survey to give feedback to managers — they said it helped drive real change within their organizations. Others like its reporting tools and felt the functionality was easy to adopt and navigate. Retirement funds were a point of contention. Nearly every user who talked about trying to access their pension fund said it was difficult and took longer than expected, ran into issues trying to figure out how to do so or recorded other problems. These negative reviews came mainly from the site TrustRadius. Reviewers posted some comments during an apparent post-COVID backlog. However, many others came from 2019 or earlier. Users were also displeased with the customer service. They complained about a lack of updates, murky communication and misquotes. Even the positive reviews for the customer service said representatives were helpful, but clearly very overworked. Willis Tower Watson may be a good choice for small to medium businesses looking for help with finances and risk management; however, tread carefully around its retirement services.
Avature is a talent management, recruiting and HR solution. Reviewers were most pleased with the recruiting tools saying it was easy to reach out to candidates, send automated emails, analyze the candidate pool and easily access past employment. They liked the dashboard and felt the system was easy to navigate with sophisticated search functionality. Most felt the support was adequate and the customer service was responsive, leading to easy setup and implementation. Many customized it to fit their specific workflows and found it useful. Other well-reviewed features included reporting and automation. One standard warning from reviewers was that Avature is a platform with robust features. They advised potential users to understand their priorities and requirements list inside and out before adopting the platform. Otherwise, this could lead to using a platform with more features than a smaller or less complicated business might need. Reviewers reported some issues with integrations and found the resume management somewhat unwieldy. Overall, Avature is an appropriate choice for medium and large enterprise ventures with complex recruiting needs. It’s beneficial for companies who screen large talent pools and want a broader HR suite.
Recent user reviews paint TalentGuard as a user-friendly talent management system with strengths in streamlining workflows and improving skills management. Many users appreciate the platform's intuitive interface, which cuts down on training time for HR teams and employees – a key advantage considering the often-complex nature of HR software. Furthermore, features like automated performance reviews and skills gap analysis are seen as valuable assets, freeing up HR professionals from administrative tasks and empowering employees to take charge of their development. This can be particularly beneficial for organizations with a growing or geographically dispersed workforce, where fostering a culture of self-ownership is crucial. However, TalentGuard also receives critiques around its reporting functionality and customizability. Some users feel the reporting options lack the depth needed for advanced data analysis, potentially hindering strategic decision-making for larger companies. Additionally, concerns arise regarding the platform's ability to adapt to specific needs. While TalentGuard caters to a variety of industries, businesses with unique HR processes might find it challenging to fully tailor the system to their existing workflows. In these cases, competitors offering greater reporting features or a more customizable user interface might be a better fit. Overall, TalentGuard seems well-suited for small and medium-sized businesses, particularly those in fast-paced fields where skills development is a priority. Its user-friendly design and focus on core talent management functionalities make it a strong option for organizations seeking to streamline HR processes, improve skills management, and empower employees. However, companies with complex reporting needs or highly customized HR workflows might want to explore TalentGuard's competitors before making a final decision.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...