Our analysts compared talentReef vs Oracle Talent Management based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Talent Management Systems, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Talent Management Systems
talentReef has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 72% when considering 200 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Oracle Talent Management has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 71% when considering 913 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Oracle Talent Management and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Compensation Management and Platform Capabilities.
Talentreef provides user-friendly recruiting and talent management capabilities aimed at organizations in the service industry that have an hourly workforce. One con unanimously indicated by users is that it lags and crashes while performing multiple actions, including on the app. However, the app generally enables great mobility, as users can access all features and tools whenever needed. In addition, customer support is quick and effective according to the majority of users. In summary, the system is a good option for companies needing to recruit and manage a wide pool of talent.
Oracle is an overall talent management solution. Performance management was one of its most popular aspects. Users liked the overall management, professional development and skill set defining features. Its employee management, onboarding and talent management worked well aiding in optimizing the workforce. Recruiting was an especially well-liked tool with its ability to check candidate status, pull transcripts and engage in talent sourcing. Last, users were happy with its reporting elements as well. As for reviewer dissatisfaction, the most disliked aspect was the price. It’s a comprehensive and expensive product. This included a lack of adequate skill-based search, poor navigation, problems that arose from internet connections, and an overall feeling of it being too complicated. Many users also experience bugs, glitches and a slow data management process. The initial learning curve was said to be steep, it was hard to navigate, and users disliked the UI and lack of expansive documentation. Overall, this is a good tool for a medium-sized or enterprise company, especially one that’s looking for help recruiting talent and engaging in professional development. Though users should leave time for adapting to its somewhat complicated functionality. For smaller businesses or those with limited budgets, this is likely not the best solution.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...