DevSkiller vs CodeSubmit

Is DevSkiller a skillful choice for evaluating technical talent? DevSkiller is a cloud-based platform designed to help companies assess the coding skills of potential hires. User reviews from the past year are largely positive, praising its user-friendly interface, diverse range of coding assessments, and realistic simulations of on-the-job tasks. For example, one user highlighted DevSkiller's ability to "evaluate candidate's technical skills in a more efficient and faster way," saving time for both recruiters and senior developers. Another user praised the platform's "extensive filters," which allow for granular analysis of employee skills. However, some users have pointed out drawbacks, such as the high cost compared to competitors like Codility and HackerRank. One review noted that while DevSkiller offers a "great mix of powerful features," its pricing might be a barrier for some organizations. Another user mentioned encountering issues with the platform not loading during long tests, although they acknowledged the excellent customer support received. Additionally, while DevSkiller boasts a comprehensive feature set, some users have expressed a desire for more robust reporting capabilities. Overall, DevSkiller appears to be a good fit for companies seeking a comprehensive and user-friendly platform to assess technical skills, particularly those with the budget to accommodate its premium pricing. However, organizations with limited resources may want to explore alternative solutions before committing.

How do you submit to the idea that CodeSubmit might be the key to unlocking your next great hire? User reviews from the last year paint a largely positive picture of CodeSubmit, particularly for its effectiveness in providing a realistic coding environment that allows candidates to flex their coding muscles through real-world tasks instead of abstract problems. For instance, one user, a CTO of a small startup, praised CodeSubmit's extensive library of frameworks and projects, highlighting how it saved him the time and effort of creating technical tests from scratch. This sentiment is echoed by other users who appreciate the platform's user-friendly interface and the ability to tailor assessments to specific job roles.However, some users point out a couple of areas where CodeSubmit could improve. A recurring concern is the lack of seamless integration with Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), which can be a bit of a headache for larger organizations. Additionally, the platform's pricing structure, while considered fair by some, has been flagged as potentially pricey for startups operating on a shoestring budget. Despite these minor drawbacks, CodeSubmit's strengths lie in its ability to facilitate a more practical and less stressful technical assessment experience, making it particularly well-suited for companies looking to evaluate candidates based on real-world skills rather than just their ability to solve theoretical problems.