Top C.H. Robinson Alternatives & Competitors For 2024

C.H. Robinson's software has received mixed reviews from users over the past year, with some praising its comprehensive features and others criticizing its complexity and customer support. Users appreciate the platform's ability to manage various aspects of transportation and logistics, including shipment tracking, carrier management, and freight quoting. The software's strength lies in its extensive network of carriers and its ability to provide real-time visibility into shipment status. However, some users find the interface to be overwhelming and difficult to navigate, particularly for those new to transportation management systems. Additionally, customer support has been cited as a weakness, with users reporting long wait times and unhelpful responses. Compared to similar products, C.H. Robinson stands out for its vast network and global reach, making it suitable for businesses with complex shipping needs. However, its complexity and customer support issues may deter smaller businesses or those seeking a more user-friendly experience. Ultimately, C.H. Robinson's software is best suited for large enterprises with extensive transportation requirements and dedicated personnel to manage the platform effectively.

Oracle Transportation Management (OTM) is a powerful TMS solution with a comprehensive set of features, but it's not without its drawbacks. One of the most common complaints from users is the complex user interface (UI). Many users find the UI to be difficult to navigate and learn, which can lead to frustration and inefficiency. For example, one user commented, "The UI is so clunky and outdated. It takes me forever to find the information I need." This can be a major drawback for companies that need a user-friendly system that can be easily adopted by their employees. Another common complaint is the high cost of ownership. OTM is a relatively expensive product, and the licensing fees and ongoing maintenance costs can be a significant burden for small and medium-sized businesses. One user said, "The cost of OTM is just too high. We were looking for a more affordable solution." This is especially true when compared to other TMS solutions on the market, such as SAP Transportation Management and JDA Transportation Management. However, despite these drawbacks, OTM also has a number of strengths. One of the biggest strengths is its comprehensiveness. OTM offers a wide range of features and functionality, which can be a major advantage for companies with complex transportation needs. One user said, "OTM is a very powerful tool. It has all the features we need to manage our transportation operations efficiently." This is especially true when compared to some of the more basic TMS solutions on the market. Another strength of OTM is its scalability. OTM can be easily scaled to accommodate the needs of growing businesses. This is important for companies that expect their transportation needs to increase over time. One user said, "OTM is very scalable. We've been able to easily add users and functionality as our business has grown." This is not as true for some of the smaller TMS solutions on the market, which may not be able to accommodate the needs of larger businesses. Overall, OTM is a powerful and comprehensive TMS solution that can be a good fit for companies with complex transportation needs. However, the high cost of ownership and the complex UI may be drawbacks for some companies.

Logility provides effective features for supply change and transportation management, with users calling out its planning, forecasting and modeling tools as notable strengths. Reviews unanimously indicate that the initial setup is challenging and cumbersome. There’s also a steep learning curve and the software is difficult to customize. However, prompt and effective customer support is offered to help resolve any issues. It has a simple user interface, and users also appreciate how easy it is to manipulate and manage data. Overall, it’s a good choice for companies looking to get extensive supply chain and transportation capabilities.

Navigating the labyrinth of Transportation Management Systems (TMS) can feel overwhelming, but Manhattan TMS emerges as a compelling contender, offering a robust suite of features designed to streamline transportation and logistics operations. User feedback from the past year paints a picture of a solution celebrated for its ease of use and comprehensive functionality, yet shadowed by concerns regarding its cost and perceived rigidity. Manhattan TMS distinguishes itself through its intuitive interface and extensive capabilities encompassing planning, execution, and tracking. The software's integration with other Manhattan Associates solutions further enhances its appeal, creating a unified ecosystem for managing various aspects of the supply chain. However, the platform's premium pricing and potential lack of flexibility have drawn criticism from some users, particularly those seeking more customizable solutions. These factors are crucial considerations for businesses evaluating TMS options, as they directly impact the software's affordability and adaptability to unique operational requirements. Ultimately, Manhattan TMS appears well-suited for larger enterprises with complex transportation needs and the budget to invest in a top-tier solution. Its comprehensive feature set and integration capabilities can empower these organizations to optimize their transportation networks and achieve significant efficiency gains.

IntelliShift’s end-to-end suite is a good fit for fleet managers that require software with a simple user interface along with intuitive functions and features. Users also get all-time access to actionable insights such as fleet location, fuel consumption, driver safety and vehicle condition, which help make necessary decisions to optimize fleet management. On the other hand, user reviews indicate that it occasionally shows inaccurate locations and ETAs, and it lags while updating information. Running fleet-wide reports is also cumbersome. Despite the drawbacks, it can be a good choice for companies in need of robust TMS software.