Ivanti Endpoint Manager vs Citrix Endpoint Management

Is Ivanti Endpoint Manager the "endoint" to your endpoint management woes? User reviews paint a mixed picture of this comprehensive UEM solution. While lauded for its robust features and efficiency, particularly in patch management and software distribution, some users find its complexity and occasional agent issues to be a drawback. For instance, one user praised its ability to manage a large number of devices from a central location, highlighting its comprehensive feature set. However, another user pointed out that the agent, while generally reliable, can sometimes be resource-intensive depending on the policy configuration. A key strength of Ivanti Endpoint Manager is its speed in deploying patches and software installations, especially for Windows devices, a crucial factor in maintaining security and productivity. Its detailed device data gathering and automation capabilities contribute significantly to increased IT productivity. However, some users recommend opting for the self-hosted version for greater control and flexibility, suggesting that the cloud-based version might have limitations in customization. The software's integration capabilities with other IT management solutions are also seen as a major plus, as it streamlines workflows and boosts overall efficiency. Overall, Ivanti Endpoint Manager is best suited for organizations prioritizing efficient patch management and software distribution, particularly those with a large Windows device ecosystem. Its comprehensive features and integration capabilities make it a good fit for organizations looking to streamline their IT operations, but a consideration of the self-hosted option might be necessary for those requiring a high degree of customization and control.

How do you manage to keep up with the latest in Unified Endpoint Management? Citrix Endpoint Management (CEM) has garnered a mixed bag of user reviews, with some praising its robust feature set and others finding it a tad clunky. Users rave about CEM's comprehensive device management capabilities, highlighting its ability to wrangle a diverse herd of devices and operating systems under one digital roof. They also give a thumbs-up to its tight integration with the Citrix Workspace suite, making it a natural fit for organizations already invested in the Citrix ecosystem. However, the honeymoon phase seems to fade a bit when it comes to user-friendliness. Several users have pointed out that the application wrapping process can feel like navigating a maze, and the pace of updates sometimes lags behind the speed of the IT world. This sluggishness, some argue, can make maintaining compliance a bit of a tightrope walk. Resource consumption is another area where CEM seems to be a bit of a gourmand, potentially leaving older systems feeling a bit sluggish. Despite these hiccups, CEM's strengths in managing a diverse device landscape and its seamless integration capabilities make it a good fit for organizations already swimming in the Citrix pool and those prioritizing robust security features. However, those seeking a more lightweight and intuitive solution might want to explore alternatives like NinjaOne, especially if extensive training resources aren't on the menu.