Microsoft Teams vs Jitsi

Microsoft Teams is a chat-based platform that offers online meetings, document sharing, screen recording and chat and allows businesses to communicate effectively. According to users who have tried this product, their alerts and notifications lack consistency. Slow speed and performance is another con witnessed by users. Most users appreciate user-friendliness. Screen sharing is another worthy function. In short, businesses scouting for a communication tool that is easy to learn can give it a try.

Is Jitsi the real deal when it comes to video conferencing, or does it fall flat? Jitsi is an open-source video conferencing platform that has garnered praise for its user-friendly design, high-quality audio and video, and robust features, making it a compelling alternative to more popular platforms. Users particularly appreciate its cost-effectiveness and security features, such as end-to-end encryption and lock-protected rooms. Its compatibility with various devices and operating systems, along with its ability to integrate with tools like Google Calendar and Google Docs, further enhances its appeal. For instance, one user highlighted Jitsi's role in enabling a cost-effective solution for a non-profit client by leveraging its freely available tier. However, Jitsi is not without its drawbacks. Some users have reported occasional stability issues and a less intuitive interface compared to competitors like Zoom. The absence of dedicated desktop applications limits its accessibility to mobile and web platforms. Additionally, the participant limit of 75 per meeting could be restrictive for larger conferences. Despite these limitations, Jitsi is a solid choice for quick, low-impact meetings, particularly for users prioritizing flexibility, security, and cost-effectiveness. Its open-source nature allows for customization and self-hosting, making it particularly attractive to privacy-conscious users and organizations with specific requirements.