Crew vs Oracle Workforce Management

Is your team rowing in different directions? Crew might just be the oar you need to get everyone in sync. Over the past year, user reviews paint a picture of Crew as a robust scheduling and communication tool, particularly well-suited for deskless teams in industries like retail, hospitality, and healthcare. Users frequently highlight Crew's scheduling flexibility, allowing managers to easily create and modify schedules, while employees appreciate the ability to swap shifts and request time off directly through the app. The built-in communication features, including group messaging and one-on-one chats, are lauded for fostering team collaboration and streamlining communication, especially for dispersed teams. Crew's strength lies in its mobile-first design, making it accessible and convenient for employees who are always on the go. However, some users note that Crew's time and attendance tracking could be more comprehensive, lacking features like geofencing and detailed reporting. Integrations with payroll systems are also limited, which can create additional manual work for administrators. While Crew offers a free plan, several key features, such as task management and advanced reporting, are reserved for paid plans, which can be a drawback for smaller businesses. In comparison to competitors like When I Work and 7shifts, Crew stands out with its user-friendly interface and focus on employee engagement. Features like shout-outs and team surveys contribute to a positive work environment and help managers stay connected with their teams. Crew's emphasis on communication and scheduling flexibility makes it an ideal choice for businesses with a large, deskless workforce that values employee engagement and streamlined operations. Keep in mind that the software landscape is constantly evolving, so it's always a good idea to check for the latest features and integrations before making a decision.

While Oracle Workforce Management (OWFM) holds its ground against competitors with its comprehensive features and robust capabilities, user reviews paint a mixed picture. On the positive side, users praise OWFM's ability to boost workforce visibility and optimize schedules, leading to reduced costs and improved employee satisfaction. One user highlights, "Real-time insights help me make better decisions about staffing and scheduling," while another notes a 20% reduction in overtime expenses. Increased employee engagement is another highlight, as users appreciate the self-service tools and scheduling flexibility. However, OWFM also faces criticism for its complexity. Users find implementation and training demanding, and the steep learning curve can be challenging. Additionally, some find the software inflexible and lacking the customization options offered by competitors like Workday and UKG Workforce Central. This can be a deal-breaker for organizations with unique needs. The cost of OWFM is another point of contention. Users acknowledge its value but point out that the initial investment and ongoing maintenance costs are significantly higher than some competitors. Overall, while OWFM delivers undeniable benefits, its complexity and cost may deter some organizations. Ultimately, its suitability depends on weighing its strengths against its weaknesses and the specific needs of your organization.